A look into the FUTURE of the Premier League
Football is constantly changing and evolving. 1981 saw the introduction of three points, instead of two, in the English football league. This immediately increased the value of a win and stands today as one of the most successful and simple changes ever made o the game. All-seater stadiums were made compulsory in the Premier League from as recently as the 1994-95 season, while this term has seen the introduction of the home-grown rule aimed at protecting the national game.
Despite FIFA’s reluctance to discuss goal-line technology, the international governing body of football, alongside the Premier League and UEFA, are prepared to make changes when deemed necessary. So what changes are we likely to see in the future? Find out below….
A debt free Premier League?
UEFA has made tackling the enormous debt threatening to engulf European football their number one priority after approving new spending plans in May. By 2012 clubs must start to at least break even at the end of each financial year and a failure to do so will lead to UEFA imposed sanctions, the most severe being exclusion from European football.
The new spending regulations will have major implications on the Premier League. Portsmouth became the first club in Premier League history to go into administration, while a recent report showed that England’s top-flight clubs owe an astonishing 56% of Europe’s total debt.
Clubs will now have to spend wisely and work tirelessly to move away from the red and this can only be positive for the financial stability of English football. It could have a major impact on the transfer market over the next few years and the influence of foreign ownership and other benefactors. A debt free Premier League may be too ambitious but the initial steps taken will help protect the future of the game for years to come.
A breakaway super league?
Despite UEFA’s honest intentions for reducing debt, their severe stance on lending and borrowing could back-fire. Nine of the last ten Champions League winners are also amongst the top ten clubs in European football carrying the most debt. Manchester United are top of this list with a total debt standing at £727m, although they are closely followed by the likes of AC Milan, Barcelona and Real Madrid.
UEFA rely on these major clubs to attract viewers, sponsorship and revenue and they are realistically too important to the competition to ban completely. UEFA would be left with a glorified Europa League. These clubs may also make the decision for UEFA and decide they do not need the Champions League and enter into discussions to form a breakaway league, something which has been discussed in the past between members of the now defunct elite G-14 unit.
Robotic linesmen and further rule changes?
Linesmen up and down the country will be pleased to hear that they could be replaced in the future by robots. A university in South Africa has created a programme which can learn human behavior, something which could be developed further and used to make decisions on matchday. Although, we are still undecided if they will be able to get their head around the interfering with play rule.
Goal-line technology remains the obvious potential change, however FIFA are refusing to discuss the matter and rejected a proposal from the Italian Football Federation to trail run the technology in a pre-season friendly. Global positioning systems could also be implemented to give the referee instantaneous live feedback on players and the position of the ball on the field, helping eradicate human error. A ten-minute sin-bin rule for a yellow card offence has also been discussed in a bid to deter sides from repetitive fouling.
Genetic superhuman athletes?
Players would wear their own bespoke kit designed to replace the vital fluids lost through sweating during a game. Such minerals could be incorporated into the fabric of a football kit.
Training would also be revolutionised so club’s can asses a player’s nervous system capabilities throughout a session, as well as electronic equipment which could adapt instantaneously to ensure an optimum workout. This, and other advances, will lead to players being able to cover 50% more ground than today’s Premier League players and increase speed of movement by 15%. Recovery times will also be increased by 300% through cryotherapy and magnetic therapy. Individualised pre-match drinks will also release nutrients at specific times during a game, meaning fatigue will be a thing of the past.
Stadium living and an interactive live match experience?
Newly built stadiums will be complete with villages, residential areas and retail complexes. Fans will be able to live in a campus-style compound around the ground in their own little community, for the ultimate supporter’s experience.
The match day experience will also be revolutionised with miniature monitors placed in each seat with varying camera angles and in-seat services. Food and drink will also be able to be ordered over the internet and brought to your seat. Vibrating seats could also be optional.
You can read more of my blogs HERE or follow me on Twitter.
Top TEN: Premier League Mavericks
Football News 24/7
If we had robotic linesmen then who would we be able to yell at during the game?
Reply
I think UEFA are playing a dangerous game by threatening to throw out the top sides in Europe unless they sort out their finances. It is of course good for the game, however a breakaway league will be on the agenda again soon
Reply
Tony Reply:
July 3rd, 2011 at 8:42 pm
Who’s going to sponsor a self appointed Haarlem Globetrotter league- there’s a recession and most major sponsors are already in long term contracts. Who’s going to do the TV coverage- again many TV companies are already locked into agreements. But most importantly who’s going to watch something that doesnt mean anything. Sponsors and TV companies hate empty stadiums. Remember the snooker event where the crowd were asked to move to make it look like a bigger audience. Do I need to remind you of the Barcelona vs Newcastle dead CL rubber played in front of 5,000 Geordies and 3 drenched Spaniards. Or that the last major breakaway in world sport led by Kerry Packer had virtually every game played in front of crowds of less than 500. And don’t say that always happens with cricket because the Boxing Day Melbourne test normally plays to 100,000. Packer soon came to heal with all the money he was losing. So would a league with no top notch sponsors,rubbish TV deals and the only audience interest from the teams actually playing. RIP super league.
Reply
tenner says goal line technology, robotic linesman, breakaway super league, Harry losing his twitch will all happen before Liverpool win the league again.
Reply
Michael Reply:
July 3rd, 2011 at 12:35 pm
And I’ll bet you a tenner that it’ll also be introduced before Arsenal win the Champions League…
Reply
steffo Reply:
July 3rd, 2011 at 12:46 pm
and i bet you 2 are manu fans
Reply
Um Reply:
July 3rd, 2011 at 1:55 pm
I bet the person calling themself “Gooner” is an Arsenal fan, myself.
Gooner you are probably right. I think I’ll keep my tenner!
Reply
liverpool…
Liverpool must play 4-3-3 formation .
Stop the blady defensive game and play attacking game with 4-3-3.
Reply
Liverpool are crap.
Reply
How they can bring in this FFP is a mystery to me when on the one hand Real and Barca negotiate their own TV deals which work out inordinately lopsidedly with the rest of the Spanish League, Man Utd and the other clubs mentioned have hundreds of millions debt and yet on the other, any money put into a club in England (sponsorship etc) has to be judged in relation to the rest of the clubs in the league…eg. Man City’s and Chelsea’s owners can’t get sponsorship which is deemed excessive in relation to other clubs and their standing in England and Europe…
Reply
manchester is blue. trafford will be to.
Reply
Just to follow up…Barca and Madrid currently get £136m a year from their TV deal and Man Utd got around £60m…fair enough you might say, but when you see that Real and Barca gobble up 35% of the total La Liga TV revenue between them, then that is how skewed it is…they had a vote in Spain to more evenly share out the TV money and of the 20 teams, 18 voted in favour…the 2 who voted against?? I’ll let you work it out…how is that fair in the FFP??
Reply
simmo Reply:
August 20th, 2011 at 5:23 am
only 35%, try scottish football and work out how much the old firm take in tv revenue compared to everyone else!! it puts the greed of spains top 2 to shame!!!!
Reply
Whole thing sounds good to me.Teams like Manure and the Binscratchers are in the deep sh!t and get chucked oot. Now ask yourself if Mike Ashley is doin a good job or not/ !!!! Bring it on UEFA. Howay the Lads.
Reply