Juan Mata v Jamie Carragher – a battle Liverpool cannot afford to lose
Juan Mata’s arrival at Chelsea in the summer has seen new manager Andre Villas-Boas deliver on his promise of expansive, attacking football. The former Valencia man has brought a real spring to the step of an aging Chelsea squad and provided the much-needed boost to put Fernando Torres on the right path to his form of old.
With Glen Johnson being a far better attacking full-back than one who excels in the art of defence, manager Kenny Dalglish may look to the returning Jamie Carragher (if fit) to keep the Spanish international quiet. With a back-four that has not always been up to standard, Juan Mata may look to exploit the lack of pace in Jamie Carragher and target the Liverpool defender as a weak-link in a possible right-back position.
Needles to say, much of Chelsea’s attacking creativity will come through Mata, a player well versed in the possession football Roman Abramovich is so desperate to see at Stamford Bridge. A player who is lethal in front of goal and with the creative touch to unlock a Liverpool side who will be dogged in their defence, stopping Juan Mata may be the key to a Liverpool result next weekend.
Fancy watching Chelsea v Liverpool from a Stamford Bridge box? Simply click on the link below, sign up with 188BET.com and deposit £10 into your account. Losing bets of up to £25 will even be refunded.
Click on the banner below to win Chelsea v Liverpool BOX tickets – there’s no time like the present!


Football News 24/7

who ever wrote this is talking out of their arse. Carragher wouldn’t be playing right back, kelly would if kenny wasn’t sure about johnson, make a page about a battle when the lineups have been announced.
Reply
james maciel Reply:
November 13th, 2011 at 11:57 pm
mata doesnt play on left he plays a a central playmaker drifting around therefore it may be carraghers priority to mark him!
Reply
We are going fine without carra I the side….
Unless Lenny has lost the, Carra shouldn’t be playing whilst we arent conceding!!
Reply