In hindsight would Manchester United have proved the better move?

Date: 9th February 2012 at 3:17 pm
Written by RantiSamz

It has become a norm in the modern game to see players with high expectations become lost or fall short along the way their playing career, but you have to look at the implications of John Obi Mikel’s move to Chelsea when he joined.

Did he go to Chelsea because he thought he would get first team football, or did he see it as a opportunity to be part of a big club and move away from the Norwegian side, Lyn Oslo?

There was a huge buzz surrounding John Obi Mikel as a young up and coming talent. The Nigerian international took the world by storm at the FIFA Youth World Championships in Nigeria, 2005, warranting him the right to be one of the most highly anticipated prospects in world football.

He epitomised his worth at the Under 17s FIFA World Cup with extraordinary performances through the tournament, the 24 year old was given the ‘Silver Ball’ after his team were runners ups to Argentina in the finals, which is not bad considering he came second to Lionel Messi .

Teams that paid special attention to Mikel’s progress were the Premier League’s top teams at the time, Manchester United and Chelsea.

The Nigerian born midfielder came to England with huge expectations, and it was clear that top teams around Europe had the young midfielder on their radar.

Since Mikel’s controversial move to Stamford Bridge in 2006, it’s fair to say that he has found it hard to establish himself as the top class player many football critics made him out to be. Jose Mourinho was adamant in finding a replacement for Makelele, and after impressing in a first team training session with Chelsea he believed the likes of John Obi Mikel would suit the mould.

However, since then, the Chelsea midfielder has seen four managers come and go which has clearly not helped his development and his stability at the club. Furthermore, His failure to cement a primary role has proved costly to his position in the national side. The former Nigerian coach Samson Siasia said, “Sincerely Mikel is not the same player that I knew in 2005, when we finished second behind Argentina in the U20 World Cup.”

His commitment to the national side was brought into question after he was dropped from the Nigerian squad for not attending qualifying rounds during the African Nations and Olympics.

If we are talking about personal development, it would be silly to write off the man management skills of Jose Mourinho, but in all sincerity, Sir Alex Ferguson would have been the ideal candidate to taking Mikel’s football to the next level. United’s permanence at the time would have been enough to nurture John Obi Mikel into the player everyone expected him to be.

The Nigerian international has looked good in patches for the West London side, but if the truth be told it can argue that he has not succeeded in reaching his full potential. However, we’ve seen the likes of Wayne Rooney, Cristiano Ronaldo and Nani exceed all expectations at United simply because of the faith Ferguson has showed in them.

Could the same be said for Mikel at Chelsea? Michael Essien has returned from injury and new manager Andres Villas Boas has brought in the likes of Oriol Romeu from Barcelona and Raul Miereles from Liverpool.

Although it seems that the Portuguese manager had opted for the Super Eagle in his first team, injuries in the last few weeks may cost him his position again. The 24 year old has been declared fit for the West Bromwich Albion for the weekend and with 18 appearances for Chelsea this season already he’ll be hoping to win his new manager over again.

Former Southampton player Jo Tessem, who worked with Mikel at Lyn Olso, said “He could go straight into a top Premiership club”. He’s done the hard part but six years down the line he is yet to fulfil his full potential as a complete midfielder.

Nonetheless, a move to Old Trafford would have not done his credentials at a young age any harm whatsoever, Mikel will have been at the club for 6 years now and despite his presence in stature, Chelsea fans will be the first to tell you he is not as great as he was made out to be.

You need the Adobe Flash player to view this video


Rate this article

0 votes Vote!!
 

7 Comments

  • Vladimir says:
    Date: February 9th, 2012 at 6:19 pm

    Ouch !! Mikel should read this !!

    Reply

    says: Ouch !! Mikel should read this !!
    Vladimir
  • Frank says:
    Date: February 9th, 2012 at 6:25 pm

    Genuinely not having a dig, but is hindsight even still applicable six years after an event has happened? Surely there’s something a bit newer to talk about.

    Reply

    says: Genuinely not having a dig, but is hindsight even still applicable six years after an event has happened? Surely there's something a bit newer to talk about.
    Frank
  • Dan says:
    Date: February 9th, 2012 at 7:59 pm

    This author is mad to think SAF is the reason Rooney Ronaldo and Nani became excellent players. First, Rooney was already a phenom before coming to Manchester. Same can be said for Nani at Sporting. I can maybe give you ronaldo, because before Manchester, he was more a play maker then a goal scorer. But to put the credit on Sir alex and not the player is madness. Just as many talented players have failed to live up to expectations in Manchester as any other place you dolt.

    Reply

    Bred Red Reply:

    Hard for a Citeh to accept SAF is a, if not the top manager in the EPL and that, without the billions of £’s being flushed into the sky blues transfer coffers.
    I doubt I’ll have an argument from fair and honest minded followers of football that Fergie is up there with the greats such as Shankley, Busby, Revie and others as managers.

    Reply

    says: This author is mad to think SAF is the reason Rooney Ronaldo and Nani became excellent players. First, Rooney was already a phenom before coming to Manchester. Same can be said for Nani at Sporting. I can maybe give you ronaldo, because before Manchester, he was more a play maker then a goal scorer. But to put the credit on Sir alex and not the player is madness. Just as many talented players have failed to live up to expectations in Manchester as any other place you dolt.
    Dan
  • Bred Red says:
    Date: February 9th, 2012 at 9:05 pm

    Dan Says:
    Read & try, hard as it may seem, UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING SAIUD. Nowhere did it say Rooney, Ronaldo & Nani because of SAF.
    QUOTE:
    “However, we’ve seen the likes of Wayne Rooney, Cristiano Ronaldo and Nani exceed all expectations at United simply because of the faith Ferguson has showed in them.”
    END QUOTE
    UNDERSTAND THE WORDING, “Because of the faith Ferguson showed in them.”

    Reply

    says: Dan Says: Read & try, hard as it may seem, UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING SAIUD. Nowhere did it say Rooney, Ronaldo & Nani because of SAF. QUOTE: "However, we’ve seen the likes of Wayne Rooney, Cristiano Ronaldo and Nani exceed all expectations at United simply because of the faith Ferguson has showed in them." END QUOTE UNDERSTAND THE WORDING, "Because of the faith Ferguson showed in them."
    Bred Red
  • Bred Red says:
    Date: February 9th, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    Sorry about the typo’s folks, I really must get a new keyboard.

    Reply

    says: Sorry about the typo's folks, I really must get a new keyboard.
    Bred Red
  • John says:
    Date: February 10th, 2012 at 9:08 am

    3 reasons for Mikel’s demise:
    1. He lost one yr during which chelsea & manU fought over him. Consequently he grew fat and lost his speed and guile.
    2. Mourinho turned him into a defender… Mikel was an attacking(goals creating & scoring) midfielder. Those who criticise Mikel should watch the videos of WYC 2005. He was better than Messi imo. Messi only got the golden ball because Argentina defeated Nigeria through 2(dubious) penalties scored by Messi.
    3. Chelsea spoilt him with money. When young african players are paid huge amounts, they lose their heads and stop working hard. I think Mikel is only OK that he is the club. He s not bothered by even what we re saying now!

    Reply

    says: 3 reasons for Mikel's demise: 1. He lost one yr during which chelsea & manU fought over him. Consequently he grew fat and lost his speed and guile. 2. Mourinho turned him into a defender... Mikel was an attacking(goals creating & scoring) midfielder. Those who criticise Mikel should watch the videos of WYC 2005. He was better than Messi imo. Messi only got the golden ball because Argentina defeated Nigeria through 2(dubious) penalties scored by Messi. 3. Chelsea spoilt him with money. When young african players are paid huge amounts, they lose their heads and stop working hard. I think Mikel is only OK that he is the club. He s not bothered by even what we re saying now!
    John

Leave a Comment



Your Comment:

Subscribe to our VIP mailing list

Enter Security Code:

If you want your picture to display next to your comments you can join our VIP Lounge where you can add your profile image, support your team and connect with other fans.