“You don’t know what you’re doing!” Mr Chairman

Date: 20th February 2012 at 7:27 pm
Written by Will Taylor

A lone figure sits in a recently vacated office. A smouldering gun rests silently in his hand. He knows this was an extreme measure and he could well live to regret it, but he could no longer ignore the growing unrest around him. Outside, he can hear the latest name being scratched off the door. Another manager has been fired.

Martin Allen became the latest name to join the list of controversial managerial departures this season. Mick McCarthy and Neil Warnock have both been dismissed from the top flight whilst fellow League One side Huddersfield recently axed Lee Clarke, despite just three defeats in 55 matches.

Blackpool boss Ian Holloway took to his Independent column to launch a scathing attack on ignorant chairmen that grace the Football League.

“It is all madness but that’s what you get when you have chairmen who don’t really know much about the game.

“Some chairmen have egos so big they can’t cope – and that is when we get the boot.”

It’s important to remember that despite the wealth that is splashed about in the modern game, very few clubs are ever likely to make a profit. Therefore from an owner’s perspective, a business that makes a loss can only be justified if it remains successful.

There seems to be two main types of chairman, the foreign entrepreneur who uses the club as an extension of his wealth or the ‘fan’ of the club, whose vision and judgment is often clouded by their emotions. Either way if you fail to match the targets laid out before you or replicate past achievements then you’ll barely have time to decorate your new office.

Roman Abramovich is arguably the most frequent wielder of the sack axe, having appointed an impressive seven managers since his takeover in 2003. His most recent dismissal of Carlo Ancelotti raised a few eyebrows considering his maiden double winning season, but it appears his lust for the Champions League knows no boundaries.

Sheikh Mansour has also coupled his injection of millions into the club with the ruthless dismissal of Mark Hughes. During his brief 18-month spell in charge Hughes had guided City to sixth in the League, having lost only twice in the league all season, plus he had reached the semi-finals of the Carling Cup. It seems however that perfection is the standard requirement for the Premier League elite these days.

It would be harsh to tarnish all league chairmen with the same brush. Wigan’s Dave Whelan has stood firmly by Roberto Martinez despite their constant flirtation with the drop zone. His allegiance paid off when Wigan avoided relegation on the final day of last season, yet it remains to be seen whether they can repeat the same feat this time round.

Elsewhere Blackburn owners the Venky’s have been, dare I say chicken, in regards to sacking Steve Kean, much to the displeasure of Rovers fans. Phil Gartside and Randy Lerner have also stuck by their men in the face of growing criticism from their fans. On the surface these actions appear loyal and commendable but let’s not forget that these managers were the chairmen’s own appointments and dismissing them would be acknowledging that they were wrong in the first place, and no one likes doing that.

As I’m writing this article the news of Niall Quinn’s departure is spreading like wildfire on Twitter. The former Sunderland chairman has achieved a great deal during the past six years including guiding the club back into the Premier League under Roy Keane. It’s also worth pointing out that former manager Steve Bruce was sacked just a month after Ellis Short replaced Quinn as chairman, although few would question that decision today.

Despite the apparent trigger-happy culture that surrounds football management, just two managers have been sacked in the top flight. Is this the start of a more understanding, considerate ethos amongst chairmen? Doubtful, as always it’s largely due to the vast expenditure required to turf out the old and implement the new. However, Martin O’Neill’s inspired revival at Sunderland may just prompt a few more chairmen to partake in a spot of spring-cleaning.

Are you happy with your club’s current chairman? Do they have the clubs best interest at heart? Leave a comment below or find me on Twitter @theunusedsub

You need the Adobe Flash player to view this video


Rate this article

1 votes Vote!!
 

9 Comments

  • marshy says:
    Date: February 20th, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    remember what kevin keegan said of fatash and lambiarse,one knew nothing about football and the second even less.and their behaviour certainly backs this up.

    Reply

    says: remember what kevin keegan said of fatash and lambiarse,one knew nothing about football and the second even less.and their behaviour certainly backs this up.
    marshy
  • Tublu says:
    Date: February 20th, 2012 at 8:51 pm

    Shows a complete lack of understanding about what went on at man city. ‘ruthless’ sacking of mark hughesless? 7 draws in 9 games , points dropped at home to the likes of burnley, bham and hull etc. AND hughesless was the previous regimes man.

    Reply

    Will Taylor Reply:

    Sacking a manager off the back of a win is ruthless, regardless of form.

    Also I never stated that Hughes was Mansour’s appointment, that section of the article was concerning Blackburn, Bolton and Villa.

    Reply

    james storey Reply:

    doug ellis? i think you mean ellis short my friend! decent article

    Reply

    Will Taylor Reply:

    Ah yes. I think it’s even Sir Doug Ellis nowadays, although I doubt you’ll get too many Villa fans calling him that!

    Glazing over Reply:

    Tuble totally agree with you. Hughes was given plenty of support in his role but was abyssmal. City were going nowhere fast despite the massive sums invested and you only have to look at his appalling signings to see he didnt have a scooby.

    Sheikh Mansour is a superb owner.

    Reply

    says: Shows a complete lack of understanding about what went on at man city. 'ruthless' sacking of mark hughesless? 7 draws in 9 games , points dropped at home to the likes of burnley, bham and hull etc. AND hughesless was the previous regimes man.
    Tublu
  • Will Taylor says:
    Date: February 21st, 2012 at 5:34 pm

    Tevez, Lescott and Barry have all proven to be good signings by Hughes. Yes Roque Santa Cruz was a colossal waste of money but the same could be said for Savic, Boateng and Hargreaves to an extent.

    Reply

    bnbn Reply:

    Hargreaves was a free transfer. Boateng was sold for a small profit after being injured most of the season and Savic cost £6 million and has all his best years ahead of him.Hughes was a flop after spending £200 million you would expect at the very least a few good signings.

    Reply

    says: Tevez, Lescott and Barry have all proven to be good signings by Hughes. Yes Roque Santa Cruz was a colossal waste of money but the same could be said for Savic, Boateng and Hargreaves to an extent.
    Will Taylor
  • Rodeo42 says:
    Date: February 22nd, 2012 at 2:58 pm

    Sports Direct Arena.Co.UK
    St James Sports Arena.Co.UK
    and the company name becomes
    St James Sports Company.Co.UK
    Simples,compromise and win.

    Reply

    says: Sports Direct Arena.Co.UK St James Sports Arena.Co.UK and the company name becomes St James Sports Company.Co.UK Simples,compromise and win.
    Rodeo42

Leave a Comment



Your Comment:

Subscribe to our VIP mailing list

Enter Security Code:

If you want your picture to display next to your comments you can join our VIP Lounge where you can add your profile image, support your team and connect with other fans.