FanCasts

Sit back, relax and listen to our FREE Football Podcasts. Subscribe 4 FREE to get your teams show each week.

Blogs

Intelligent, articulate, opinion. Read, rate and comment!

Banter

Create your own discussion and debate - Sign up and get involved!

Academy Soccer Coach looks back at Grand Slam Sunday and pinpoints the tactical masterstroke from Utd's coaching staff which was to secure the 3pts at Anfield.

In the fall out of Grand Slam Sunday which saw the Premiership top 4 go head to head, you didn't have to be an expert to realise where the games were won or lost The importance of set pieces has always been crucial to the outcome of games but more and more we are seeing the big games being determined in this way. While you would argue that William Gallas goal was down to individual error, you couldn't take anything away from Tevez's winner; a tactical masterstroke from United's training camp.

One thing is for sure though; both Liverpool and Chelsea will be kicking themselves for conceding sloppy goals in such high profile and important games.

When Rafa Benitez joined Liverpool his zonal marking set up at set-pieces was often a cause for debate on Match of the Day and Sky. The Liverpool players were obviously struggling to come to terms with this new set up and therefore goals were conceded from set pieces as the players adjusted to their manager's demands. In recent times this has not been a problem and Liverpool have looked very organised and strong when defending corners and free kicks, however, big coaching plaudits must go the management team at Manchester United who almost picked Liverpool's pockets to score a fantastic goal that won them the game.

Make no mistake at how fantastic Manchester United's goal was.

For coaches it's a prime example of the full picture, how clever planning and preparation leads to the ultimate prize. The process starts with the video analysis team, then to the coaches' office, out on the training pitch and then "Showtime", in a massive game.

We have all just seen how clever coaching does affect the outcome of games.

Liverpool's set up includes all 11 players back inside their own 18yd box. Two players occupy the posts and two banks of four player's line across the 6yd box and just inside the 18yd box. The first bank of four players has a role to stop the opponent's attackers from making clear runs to challenge for the ball. This enables the 2nd bank of players to get a free header clear. The Liverpool players stick to this demand 100% as directed by their manager and this is why Wayne Rooney was allowed to be unmarked just outside the box.

Manchester United's plan was to use Liverpool's tactics for their own gain. The United attackers allowed their runs to be blocked on purpose as they also wanted to block the Liverpool defenders from challenging Rooney. In addition, Rio Ferdinand's early run to the near post pulled Torres away from an area where he could prevent a pass to the edge of the box. Many will argue that Rooney's shot that found Tevez to score was fortunate however it would have been a sin if Rooney had not hit the target with his shot after such good play from his team mates. Therefore, we feel that he was certainly instructed to make sure his shot was goal bound and therefore allowing for a deflection or team mate to convert if the ball did not go directly into the net.

Will Liverpool change their tactics for the quarter final against Chelsea on Wednesday evening? I don't think they will, Benitez is a top coach who has built his vision and will still be confident of his beliefs. They were just caught out by fantastic insight from the United coaching staff and quality execution from the United players.

Set pieces are therefore crucial both attacking and defending as they are cheap goals. The meaning of the word "cheap" is that it takes very little to score from a set piece compared to the open game. Teams such as Manchester United will always back themselves to score from open play and therefore if they can score from a set piece, they will now need to concede two goals to not win the game. How often do the top teams concede two goals?

  • Average: 2.3 (6 votes)
Freddie
Picture of Freddie
What a chump - fantastic set
What a chump - fantastic set piece my arse. The initial idea was for Rooney to get a decent shot on target - he scuffed it, it got a deflection and fell to Tevez - luckily for Man U Bennayoun had stayed back to mark a goal post and Tevez had a simple tap in. Defensive mistakes will happen - don't expect Rafa to abandon a system which has made Liverpool's defence one of the meanest in the league because we concede one or two goals from set pieces.

simo
Picture of simo
you can make up a tale to
you can make up a tale to fit any situation but the end of the day roo miss hit it , tev stuck out a boot and we was lucky as anything to get the points. dont think it was a move they practiced on the training ground lol

Matt
Picture of Matt
You're forgetting one thing
You're forgetting one thing there. Rooney's shot wasn't on target. Agree the plan was good but they were quite fortunate in the way it ended up at Tevez' feet 6 yards from goal. You'd have to say on the whole though zonal marking has worked a treat for Benitez, despite so-called experts on Sky claiming it doesn't work. Whenever Liverpool concede from a set piece (which is hardly ever) zonal marking gets the blame. Yet whenever other teams frequently concede from set pieces 'man to man' marking never gets scrutinised. Seems ridiculous that one system should be derided so often, when clearly it is very effective.

Mark Liverpool Fan
Picture of Mark Liverpool Fan
Man Utd use a man marking
Man Utd use a man marking system and they looked at sixes and sevens on more than one occassion in the first half. There are pro's and cons for zonal marking and man marking. You never hear a pundit complementing zonal marking after a liverpool clean sheet. The problem is when they concede one, it looks really bad. When a man marking team concede one the idividual defender is normally singled out. When a zonal marking team concedes, there isn't an individual to blame so the manager gets it. You have to take a broader view and concede that Liverpool's excellent and consistant defensive record under Benitez indicates that Zonal marking works very well for Liverpool.

Dickie
Picture of Dickie
"Get your facts first, and
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please" My understanding of the system is that you stay in your zone rather than tracking players. Tevez's goal came about because Torres went against this principal by tracking Ferdinand, leaving a gap. This was all covered by Hansen in MOTD and he also showed another corner where Torres was on hand to make the block cos he hadn't fallen for the trick. No system is perfect and its always possible to exploit potential flaws. However, Hansen also highlighted the fact there was confusion between two of the defending players over who was doing what, so I think you could take plenty from Tevez's winner, as it appears to have resulted from a sequence of mistakes.

Guest
Picture of Guest
Get your facts right, mate.
Get your facts right, mate. Tactical masterstroke? haha. That was nothing else but a simple defensive mistake, nothing to do with a tactical masterstroke. As soon as the ball is played to a plyer outside the box(Rooney), Rafa's order as always is that the whole defensive line moves up. Mascherano who was on the first post did it, but unfortunately Benayoun who was on the second post didn't, and as such played Tevez onside. Just to tell you it was Benayoun's mistake that led to the goal not brillant coaching as you're making it to be. Btw, blocking Torres or Kuyt who was supposed to close down Rooney is hardly what I call a tactical masterstroke, sounds more like dirty play to me.

joe mcparland
Picture of joe mcparland
It doesn't matter whetherit
It doesn't matter whetherit was good tactics from manure or bad defending from the red scum, it was a goal and you lose. HA! HA! HA!

osas
Picture of osas
The problem with the zonal
The problem with the zonal system is it is not fail proof, it is flawed. The defenders take up strategic positions in the box but if the ball gets to a dangerous area within the box, the results can be catastrophic. It doesn't matter whether Fergie planned and executed the corner kick to perfection or if the goal was as a result of a lucky mistake, what matters is Fergie was able to get Rooney free in a dangerous position outside the box. Any defensive scheme that requires 11 players to stop 4 united players inside the box yet a player is still able to have a free shot at goal from inside the six yard box is a flawed system.