FanCasts

Sit back, relax and listen to our FREE Football Podcasts. Subscribe 4 FREE to get your teams show each week.

Blogs

Intelligent, articulate, opinion. Read, rate and comment!

Banter

Create your own discussion and debate - Sign up and get involved!

Southampton PodJockey Jon Pitt has had enough of the finger clicking from the Premiership powers, that seemingly allows the introduction of new initiatives, while the rest of the football league once again have to make do.

In November 2007, roughly three months ago, Manchester United manager Alex Ferguson didn't pick Darren Fletcher to play against Arsenal in the starting line-up, nor on the subs bench. Never mind, eh? One reason for this is probably that Darren Fletcher will join Alan Brazil, Massimo Taibi and Kieran Richardson in the "Did he really play for Manchester United?" pile.

Not according to Fergie. It was apparently a "kick in the teeth". Oh, well, that's football. Sometimes it goes against you ever so slightly. However, while you're in a position of Alex Ferguson's stature, you might as well use it to good effect. So in an interview, Sir Alex complained that clubs in the Premier League should have seven players on the bench, because most clubs have "more than 16 players." So, poor decision making by Fergie has led to him complaining about the League again.

Joining him in this plight are Juande Ramos, the man who has been in the country for a matter of months, and Sven, another manager who is still getting to grips with how the league works. And they've picked up the European way of managing - if it's not going your way, complain about the league system. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy, apparently is the mastermind behind a the idea which has taken some 12months to implement. But it begs the question that if he was the only one to suggest it, would it ever have happened?

So, on 7 Feb 2008, the league announced it would increase the subs bench to seven players. What joyous news this came as. It means Manchester United and other clubs will be able to add those extra precious two players from their squad of about forty. Why? Because the likes of Manchester United, Tottenham and other Premiership powers have said they now want it done different from now on and that's good enough logic for the football league to take action. No mention of lower league clubs, by the way. Just the Premier League can use the extra players because they get tired so easily. Despite playing eight games less per season and picking up wages that you or I would consider a lottery win.

Also off the presses today: The league may be extended to thirty-nine games, with one game being played overseas. Wonderful; I wonder how many thousands of Japanese enthusiasts will flock to the Saitama Stadium to witness the splendours of Derby versus Wigan?

Sometimes the Premier League really riles me, and the guys in charge should turn their ears away from the Queen on her little bits of paper and to the singing voices from the terraces. I want to see more authority and more tradition in the English game, but when these extra subs happen next season, and the possibility of overseas games by 2011; this is the decade where the Premier League dies a painful, public, humiliating death. 

 

  • Average: 5 (2 votes)
Jonesy
Picture of Jonesy
I understand your viewpoint
I understand your viewpoint Jon but football has moved on and whichever side you support, Im sure you understand that change is needed.

Brains
Picture of Brains
I like your passion John and
I like your passion John and you are right in some cases but unfortunatley not in others. The game has moved on in leap and bounds and you cant afford to have players sitting in the stands. They may earn huge fortunes but at the end of the day its not their fault, they want to move on in their careers so they need to be involved.

Wilson
Picture of Wilson
A lot of people have missed
A lot of people have missed the importaance of this implement. It will allow clubs to involve youngsters in the first team. Vital in their development and could benefit the national side.

Prem hater
Picture of Prem hater
Well done John for
Well done John for appreciating the fact that football doesnt solely revolve around the Premiership.

soso
Picture of soso
you do realise that
you do realise that introducing two more subs is helping the development of young players? managers will be able to give squad places to youngsters where in the past they were forced to choose only the best they have. now depending on the match situation (ex. if they're winning comfortably) they could bring on the youth. granted some of the decisions by the PL are potentially disastrous, like the one that's on everyone's lips at the moment, but additional places on the bench is not one of those and should have been introduced a long time ago. it certainly didn't do any evil on the continent.

Ryan
Picture of Ryan
"So, poor decision making by
"So, poor decision making by Fergie has led to him complaining about the League again." sounds really really silly and biased. Yes, his storied history of poor decision making...from the best coach in the history of the game...

Matt Brennan
Picture of Matt Brennan
Posts: 113
Joined: 2007-11-19
Equally Ryan you calling him
Equally Ryan you calling him the best coach in the history of the game could well be a biased opinion. I do understand Jon's comments it seems when the big names come calling the Premier League comes up and answers. I mean would the Football League/ FA turn round and agree with Bournemouth if they said just "let us struggle financially there is no need to make it worse by deducting ten points from us". I do not think this would happen. The big clubs make the massive amount of money and the Premier League knows that. Lets be honest if all the big clubs had come out and said NO to playing abroad the Premier League would close the topic. It is scandalous the Premier League relies on the big clubs therefore will listen to whatever tune they play. This wouldn't be a problem, however it is because the big clubs know that the League will always take notice of them.
--
Southampton PodJockey


steve
Picture of steve
what is the fuss with having
what is the fuss with having 7 subs it is keeping up with the times for goodness sake everywhere across europe have 7 subs, it gives manager more options and more flexibility, I said enough on the bbc 606 forum about the premier league oversea's proposale and it stinks but I am delighted we get 7 subs, united could have a first 11 of vds brown ferdinand vidic evra hargreaves anderson ronaldo nani tevez rooney subs kuszszec simpson pique scholes carrick giggs welbeck

darrenrichie
Picture of darrenrichie
Posts: 16
Joined: 2008-01-23
Good points but I think it
Good points but I think it takes more than Fergie having a little rant to bring new rules to the Premier League. 7 subs benefits everyone so why not ? If the premier league listened to managers and implemented what they wanted we would have video replays to make decisions, goal line sensors, referees castrated etc because all managers mention these things at some point during a season and swear blind it's for the good of the game but as far as I can tell this 7 subs thing is the only thing that you could attribute to managers mentioning it. Or is there something else that can be attributed to being implemented because of pressure from managers?