Should UEFA change the competition in order to boost revenues and interest?

Date: 11th July 2012 at 6:32 pm
Written by Hamish Mackay | Comments (12)

The second tier of European club competition, the Europa League, used to be a respected tournament, how times have changed. The insulting chant ‘Thursday night, Channel 5,’ says as much about the Europa League’s reputation as it does about Channel 5’s – neither organisation comes out in an especially positive light.

What if, however, UEFA were to move the Champions League and Europa League to alternate weeks? It is a proposal that brings with it both positive and negative connotations. However, considering the financial gap between the two competitions it could well act as a step forward in the attempts to raise the profile of the Europa League and bridge the gap between the two sets of competitors.

Benefits

The main benefit would surely be that the number of viewers for the Europa League would rise. Is it any wonder that few watch Europa League football when not only is the quality of a lesser standard but that deficiency is highlighted when you are able to compare it to the football you watched the night before.

Moreover, as much as it’s beneficial for the soul to watch as much football as possible do UEFA really expect people to be able to watch three games of midweek football?

Yes, we all love football, but we also have work, families and other halves that require some of our attention. If you have the choice between taking time off to watch football during the week you will almost certainly end up watching the Champions League.

If, however, the two European competitions were shown on alternate weeks then you would have no choice but to use the Europa League to satisfy your craving for midweek football. It might be a slow process initially but by switching to alternate weeks UEFA could create a culture whereby people watch the Europa League almost as regularly as they watch the Champions League.

Alternating the weeks would also mean that the Europa League could be played on Tuesday and Wednesday. No longer would teams have to play on the Thursday before the weekend. When teams play on Thursday it invariably means that their opponents have had at least a day longer to rest since their last league game as well as not having to play mid week.

Detrimental

The current group stage system for both competitions is arranged as such that they are both shown on one week, with weeks containing no European football interspersing the weeks containing it. As such, there would be space to put the two competitions on alternate weeks without having to greatly alter the beginning and end dates of the group stages.

The same cannot be said for the knock out stages. Because the knock out stages are played over two legs, if we wanted to alternate those weeks as well then the group stages would either have to begin earlier or the victorious teams would have almost no break between rounds. This would mean that their schedule could become increasingly manic towards the end of the season, which is tiring enough as it is. Currently the group stages end between the 4th-6th of December with the knock out rounds beginning at the beginning of February. If UEFA then had to move that date forward to January then it would mean that teams involved in European fixtures could be hit even harder by players leaving for the African Cup of Nations as they would for the coming season.

Moreover, moving to alternate weeks for both the group stages and the knock out rounds of these competitions could disrupt domestic cup competitions. For example, teams might be expected to play a cup fixture, a European fixture and two domestic league fixtures all in the space of a week, which would obviously be impossible.

Ultimately, it seems unrealistic to pile any more pressure on the end of season fixture list yet UEFA need to find a solution to the ever increasing financial inequality gap between it’s two European club competitions. If they cannot identify a solution that would raise the revenues of the Europa League then it’s participants face being left behind by their Champions League rivals.

The group stages of the Champions League bring in more than three times as much television money as is received by the winner of the Europa League. This is because of a lack of interest in the competition. Something needs to be done; quite what that is, though, remains unclear.

Follow me on Twitter @H_Mackay

 

 

12 Comments

- Leave a comment
Page:
1 2
  • keith
    July 11th, 2012

    The reason people dont bother with it has nothing to do with it being thursday night fixtures. Its because its become a dumbed down competitionsince uefa started letting in teams knocked out out of the champs league.

    • ChrisW
      July 11th, 2012

      But surely the viewing figures go up when big-name teams from the Champions’ League join?

      I don’t see any reason why teams knocked out of the CL shouldn’t compete in this as it’s a lesser competition. After all, the other teams are only there because they failed to even qualify for the CL group stage. Like the old UEFA Cup it’s always been a “best-of-the-rest” competition and winning it doesn’t mean very much.

  • Steve
    July 11th, 2012

    Maybe a point that doesn’t go down well, but how about if you win the competition (Europa league) you get into the champions league? There are probably teams that don’t have it in them to get a league qualifying space but if they can win the comp they can get in. I understand as a spurs fan this means some poor club gets dropped out of the comp but who knows maybe we could get out own back!

  • drasl
    July 11th, 2012

    The only way is to fix the situation is to change the CL to winners only, or combine the two competitions.

    Football has sadly become very similar to boxing in nature, where the best only play to the biggest pay out. Rather than a true fair competition.

  • TonyFord
    July 11th, 2012

    Read this rather scary, nightmarish vision of the future by my colleague (who goes by the name of Bluebrain on TheChels.net) here
    http://www.cleansheetsallround.co.uk/2012/06/a-sideways-glance-looking-back-at-the-future
    It is absolutely fascinating and a great read if you re interested in how future changes to Euro Football might affect clubs.

  • TonyFord
    July 11th, 2012

    Sorry, also meant to say – you might not agree with it (hey, you probably wont!) but its worth reading. Great Read Hamish, very interesting, nice one!

  • Feed The Goat
    July 11th, 2012

    I think you are all missing the point, it is only in England where the Europa League is frowned upon. It is still highly valued across the rest of Europe. We can all say it is de-valued by Champions League failures joining et al but when teams like Bolton, Fulham, Aston Villa and Tottenham play weakened teams (granted Fulham did get to the final) what message does this send to the fans?

    We have become obsessed with money rather than glory, growing up as a kid football was about winning not qualifying in the top four to get paid the most. If I played football and won the Europa League once I would probably still retire a multi-millionaire. If I qualify for the champions league year on year but do not win anything because I kept finishing third, would I be happy? Not really but I would still be rich.

    Then when talking to your kids, grand kids, etc and you tell them you played at a high level and won nothing what inspiration is that? If you say I won the second biggest tournement in European club football at least you can say you have acheived something and show what hard work will turn into i.e. Medals, trophies and riches.

    So the question should be what would you prefer, money or money and glory????

  • Barnfield
    July 11th, 2012

    Well you can watch whatever you want. As far as I am concerned if there is a choice of ANY league I watch Liverpool! I do this because I am a Liverpool fan and by that I watch them whenever I can . I suspect fans of other teams make a similar choice if their team is playing : if not then that is a different matter entirely…

  • tim
    July 11th, 2012

    all they have to do, is put more money in the uefa cup, then teams wont put out weakened teams, and the winner of the uefa should go in the champions league, because they are actual champions, not runner ups, like arsenal, man utd, champions league should only be for champions, the name says it all, and the uefa should be for runner ups, to aspire to be winners.

  • thesilentprophet
    July 11th, 2012

    Good point Tim I whole heartedly agree, problem then is that the UEFA cup becomes more competitive than the Champions League due to the sheer weight of teams finishing runners up,3rd and 4th, you would have more quality teams and the competition would be greater as you have teams that finished runners up just missing out on the title, teams that were champions the season before, teams that are chalenging for the title this season, and this will be the case from every country. The champs league would be watered down, and if by some unlikely event that the champions of England, Germany, Spain and Italy all go out early your left with the champions from Portugal, Hungary, Denmark, Scotland and etc. I wonder if City supporters felt that champions league 4th spot wasn’t a good idea at the end of the 2010/2011 season when they have the opportunity to play in Europes senior competion for only the second time in thier history?

  • bc
    July 11th, 2012

    Better still switch all the european football to weekends. still alternate between the cups. matches could be played at different times over the friday saturday and sunday night. flights are cheaper at weekends and the crowds would be awesome no time taken off work etc. if

Page:
1 2

Please log in to comment: