People get a little overworked when you take away something dear to them. Or perhaps not, perhaps it’s just the thought of having something taken away from you that riles people, even if they don’t really need it.

Football fans crave the January transfer window and view it as their own Christmas. Forget Happy New Year and all that, January 1st marks the start of insane decisions made by those in the boardrooms of clubs and the insatiable hunger from fans to unearth as much gossip as possible – only for them to shoot down the messenger when they hear something they don’t like.

So what’s the point of the January window? I know Sky will come up with a whole host of reasons to keep it going. In fact, how much of their yearly viewership comes from that month alone? When there’s not much else to talk about (or gossip about), reruns of an interview with a bloke in his car will do.

But’s it’s not really about Sky or the fans, and it never has been. I’m not one for saying I haven’t sat there insisting certain clubs should start taking themselves seriously and spend some money, but why shouldn’t clubs live and die by their own decisions? If clubs can’t make it through the season from their business in the summer window then maybe some managers need to give the whole football thing a rethink.

QPR have bought two teams in the space of six months and they still might go down. Buying a goalkeeper halfway through the season because your first-choice has been ruled out for months is acceptable, as Real Madrid were fortunate, sort of, that Iker Casillas’ injury came during the last week of January. And that’s the purpose the window should serve, not in allowing clubs to field two completely different teams in a league campaign just because a manager or owner severely screwed it up the last time around.

Isn’t a good football manager viewed as someone who can take his team and prove that they’re the best (or just a little better than others) over the course of 38 games? That’s why a league title is a better representation as to how good a team is or was than a Champions League title.

Isn’t it said that the most managerial sackings occur in November? And it’s hardly difficult to understand why. It nicely sets up a big month of spending for a new manager and his new club, who, in all honestly, don’t really have the means to part with the sort of cash usually required for a January fire fight.

Some sports leagues do the whole thing of leaving the transfer ‘window’ open throughout the year and close it just prior to the playoffs, but that really couldn’t work in football. For starters, sports teams in America are largely protected from having their best players poached during random stages of the season due to contracts, salary caps, no-trade clauses etc. None of that exists in football, and who’s to say clubs with the means to do so won’t just harass their way to victory in the transfer market? In fact, forget them. The better perspective is to look at clubs like Everton, Tottenham or Arsenal, who have players wanted by bigger clubs in England or on the continent but who are protected by the closure of the windows in August/September and January/February.

You look at the bigger teams in the Premier League this January, and for the most part you can say they were all sensible. Liverpool were always in need of another striker but also managed to find a bargain in Coutinho. The arrival of the Brazilian will improve Brendan Rodgers’ side, but it wouldn’t have broken them if they didn’t make the move. Manchester United rolled the dice on Wilfried Zaha but loaned him straight back to Crystal Palace. Nothing really to write home about there, they could have completed that signing in June. Arsenal’s move for Nacho Monreal was out of necessity, but it could be argued that Arsene Wenger should have made a signing of that quality last summer. And the same goes for Chelsea, who picked up Demba Ba for a release clause rumoured to be in effect during the summer window.

No one really comes out of this January mess on top. Clubs like QPR may survive and benefit from the increased television revenue, but then what? A club like that are unlikely to see added windfalls from competitions like the Champions League, so how do they deal with the wages they picked up this January?

Football, in reality, scraps a whole month-worth of football because the majority of clubs are too wound up with the transfer window. Emergency signings should be sanctioned, as we’ve seen in the past. But if a club is not adequately guided or prepared during the summer months for the long haul of a league season, without any safety net midway through, then that’s their problem. Live and die by the decisions you make ahead of each season.

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • Billy
    1 year ago

    Just abolish the window it would help smaller clubs in financial difficulties, they could sell players sometimes to survive.The only winners in the transfer window are the agents,it’s a rat race.Don’t have the window and deals. Can be done hopefully more easily without every man(agent)and his dog getting involved

    Reply
  • simianspur
    1 year ago

    It’s not madness, it’s part of the modern game. Adds to the excitement for me. Like the idea of scrapping Christmas football, ridiculous!
    It’s entertainment, England won’t do better with or without a Winter break.
    And the premiership will be less interesting without a January window, and your top players would be unsettled every damn week if you abolished the window altogether.

    Reply
  • Lodatz
    1 year ago

    There’s a very good reason why there’s a January transfer window: the South American leagues run from May/July to December.

    For Brazil, Argentina etc, this window is between seasons.

    Reply
  • Melon Man
    1 year ago

    Who says the transfer window is madness?

    I think it’s great for the fans, we love the entertainment, and after all, football is all about the talking points, the drama.

    I hate the way these killjoys want to sanitise the game, and that includes the protectionist FFFP regs, keeping the cartels in place at the detriment of ambition and equality.

    Reply
  • John
    1 year ago

    The only madness that needs to stop is the players’ agents. Read the comments from one of the West Ham owners. I’m sure there will be a few good ones but most of them don’t seem to have the interests of players at heart, only their own bank account.

    Reply
  • manchesterred33
    1 year ago

    It’s the same for all clubs and is an exciting time. If your playing in several different competitions and/or had severe unforeseen injury pile up to key players. Why not allow clubs to strengthen????? Point in case is QPR I dearly wish they survive the drop after what Hughes has done to that club.It’ll be a miracle if they survive and a shame when they go down. But without January transfers they wouldn’t of stood a chance.

    Reply

Related Articles:

Premier League quartet keen on Leicester star
Tottenham to join Liverpool with £15m summer move
THREE reasons Liverpool are the Premier League’s most exciting team
Ex-Man City boss wants Tottenham job
Twitter reaction as Arsenal celebrate in style