The plight of Bill Kenwright, Robert Earl and Jon Woods is representative of many English owners. They bought in to Everton at a time when their wealth was, proportionate to the other owners, relatively impressive. Both Woods and Kenwright were born in Liverpool and grew up supporting Everton. And, like many English owners, their financial situations are now comparatively modest.

As it currently stands, Arsenal, Aston Villa, Chelsea, Fulham, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Queens Park Rangers, Southampton and Sunderland are completely foreign owned.

On top of that, the Russian company Thames Sport Investment owns 51% of Reading and both Swansea and West Ham are part owned by foreign investors. So, out of the 20 Premier League teams, only seven are wholly owned by UK nationals.

This poses the questions: how long will it be before there are no English owners left and what will the consequences be of a completely foreign owned Premier League?

Clearly the main factor drawing foreign investors to the Premier League is the economic potential of owning part of such a profitable league.

The latest television rights deal for the Premier League was sold for a combined total of £3b for three seasons, and that’s just for broadcasting rights in the UK. The overseas rights are expected to go for around £2b for the same period.

If you compare this to other leagues it is clear to see just how highly our league is valued. The Bundesliga rights amount to around £1b less for the same period whilst the combined total in La Liga is £510m per season. That’s roughly half of the amount received by English clubs.

In fact the average club in La Liga will receive far less than that as the vast majority of that money goes to either Barcelona or Real Madrid.

That leads us on to the second point. Because the Premier League shares the financial packages amongst their teams the league is far more competitive. This means the potential to buy a struggling team and improve it is far greater than it would be in leagues like Spain’s.

Shirt sponsorship is also higher than any other league in the world with €128m received last season by Premier League clubs. The next highest was the Bundesliga with €121m.

So, it is clear to see why overseas investors are attracted to the Premier League. However, if our league is so profitable why aren’t more English investors attracted to owning English clubs? The fact is that despite it being the most profitable league in the world it is still hard to turn a profit owning a football club. So, for wealthy individuals looking to own a football club England is clearly the most attractive prospect yet that individual still has to have extortionate amounts of money in the first place to think about buying a club.

Perhaps there just aren’t enough people in the UK who are both incredibly wealthy and fans of football. Moreover, with every new billionaire who buys in to the Premier League the requisite level of wealth an owner needs to succeed increases.

In reality, outside of the US, there are probably very few countries that do have enough billionaires to own every single top-flight club. Therefore it makes sense that wealthy individuals from different countries would relocate their passion for football to one country. That just happens to be us.

What, then, does this mean for the future of English football? That these foreign owners love football should not be in doubt. No owner would pour so much money in to something they had no interest in. However, some owners are definitely more preoccupied with the financial side than others and just because an owner may love football, it doesn’t mean they have an incredibly strong bond with the club they own. Unlike the fans who owned clubs in the past, unlike owners like Bill Kenwright, these foreign owners are still primarily looking out for themselves.

There is nothing wrong with foreign ownership per se. However, if these owners are not held accountable for the way in which they run these clubs then there could be dangerous issues. They, after all, have a moral responsibility to safeguard the future of these clubs for the fans. Portsmouth has served as a warning for this, and it should be a warning that is carefully heeded.

Another issue is that with so much foreign money coming in there could be a danger that wealthy English fans are forever priced out of owning part of the club they love. Finally, there is an issue, which not all English fans are against but is still a worrying prospect, with regards to moving games abroad. Just as some NFL games are now played in London at Wembley, American owners could look to play some Premier League games abroad.

The financial benefits of this might be a compelling argument but it is a dangerous road to travel down. Were it to become customary, how long would it be before games were exported to other nations?

These foreign owners may be called owners but they should be thought of as stewards. These clubs are ours. Morally, they belong to the fans. We should welcome their input as long as it benefits the English leagues. Many will argue that, considering these clubs are no longer under English ownership, it is too late to have a say in such issues yet in the Premier League we have a body that is able to provide a check on the owners. Let’s hope, for the sake of the future of English football, they exercise that right.



  • g clarke
    3 years ago

    dif to fault mc when 200 mil project put into manchester

  • Melon Man
    3 years ago

    Working and middle class English fans have NEVER had a say in the ownership of their local football clubs, the founders of our football clubs, and ever since, have been upper class, very wealthy people.
    Football clubs have always been rich people’s playthings, for various reasons, the only difference now is the game has gone global with TV, and so has the financial interested parties.

    When Real, United and Arsenal were running all over the world in preseasons, trying to flog shirts and generate new plastic fans, they opened up a veritable Pandora’s box, as along with the regular fans, the big boys started to develop a passion for footy.
    Hence you get Sheikh Mansour, Thaksin Shinawatra, The Glazers, Roman Abramovich – pretty ironic really, now these same clubs are bleating about the new money when they started it, greedy buggers.

  • DaveWestAus
    3 years ago

    I forecast years ago that games would be played outside England.The top clubs have millions of fans throughout Asia alone who spend their money every week on club merchandise,and some travel to England to see a game!They watch games on TV every week in their own country; THEY WILL DEMAND TO SEE LIVE GAMES IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY IN THE FUTURE!
    And I blame the British government for allowing foreign ownership without stipulating that this would never be allowed by law!

  • Stranger here
    3 years ago

    Melon Man I can remember living in Australia in the 70s and going to watch Man. City play South Australia with Tony Book, Mike Summerby etc.
    Unfortunately we have a weak FA who are happy to take the freebies.
    Like our squads we should make clubs have to be 1/3rd English owned.

    • Melon Man
      3 years ago

      Did you become a convert then?

      Not sure City were touting their wares anywhere near the degree United, Real and the Arsenal started to do in the 90’s, although I am eager to hear more!