Much has been made of Arsene Wenger’s tactical short-comings against Manchester United. Aaron Ramsey starting on the right wing, ahead of an under-utilised Theo Walcott, persistence with Olivier Giroud and the catastrophic decision to not drop Andre Santos against the league’s best collection of wingers.

While these are all valid points, there’s a much greater problem at Arsenal undermining their ambition – their wage structure. I also think there’s an argument no matter what team Wenger put on to the pitch they would have struggled due to the inferiority of Arsenal’s squad in comparison to the best three teams in the Premier League.

The Gunners spend a vast amount of their riches on wages but receive none of the reward for their spending with their top players often looking elsewhere to earn more and win more. The fault comes from the over-spending on mediocrity. Players like Nicklas Bendtner, Denilson and Johan Djourou whose first team importance have always minimal receive much higher weekly wages at Arsenal then they would at either Manchester club or Chelsea.  Arsenal are always near the top of the wage bill table in the Premier League easily exceeding £100 million expenditure per year on their wages. Bit part players such as Marouane Chamakh, Bendtner and Sebastien Squilacci shouldn’t be earning over £50,000 per week.

If Arsenal didn’t blow such a high percentage of their wage budget on irrelevant players they’d be a lot closer Chelsea, Manchester City and Manchester United. If the weekend’s match is anything to go by they’d do well to finish within 20 points of England’s three premier teams in 2013. Prior to his move away from Arsenal in the summer, The Arsenal Truth, reported Carlos Vela was earning £50,000 a week at the club, which is madness, considering the Mexico international never established himself in the first team. I doubt any Arsenal fans would rather see the current egalitarian system than an alternative where players are paid according to ability and the club offer greater deals to marquee men such as Robin van Persie and Samir Nasri who criminally suffered due to the structure.

I’m not suggesting it’s as simplistic as offering squad players less lucrative contracts and doubling the money your best players receive. Chelsea outspend the Gunners on wages reportedly having a squad costing £191 million  last year. United and City’s wage budgets are also supposedly higher, but not to the disparity currently seen between squads. Wenger must also take the blame for poor transfers, the lacklustre Andrey Arshavin remains one of the club’s highest earners and due to his £80,000 a week wages shifting him has proved problematic. The Frenchman’s misplaced trust in Giroud and Gervinho has also affected the team; seemingly the £20 million blown on their combined transfers could have been spent better.

Much like Arsenal’s transfer policy which has seen them slip from title contenders, to their current state, where now their 63-year-old boss considers finishing fourth to be a trophy in its own right, it will be hard to gauge whether it’s the club or manager’s policy until Wenger’s gone. Many believe that there’s money available to spend at the Emirates but in buying proven talent, instead of improving and developing a group, the club would be going against their current manager’s wishes.

If it is Wenger and not Stanley Kroenke or Ivan Gazidis who enforces this farcical wage structure then further questions must be asked about whether Wenger’s the right man for Arsenal. While he has endured bad luck and has changed the footballing philosophy at the club where he has had an overwhelming impact, if his presence is undermining one of the country’s biggest club’s ambitions then he must go.

Let me know your thoughts on where it’s gone wrong for Arsenal in recent seasons on Twitter: @jimmylowson

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • Chris
    2 years ago

    Useless article, the subject of which has been uncritically plagiarised from Arsenal Truth. And it is well-known that the board has imposed the wage structure on Wenger – this was well-documented about a year ago. Don’t give up the day job…..

    Reply
    • James Lowson
      2 years ago

      Well it’s not plagiarism if you credit his work. Also Arsenal’s terrible wage system is more relevant than ever after the AGM meeting and the failings of the first team.

      Reply
  • james
    2 years ago

    Chris – did you read the article? your reply on the wage structre being place on Wenger has nothing to do with what it was about, the discrepency between poort and good players isnt enough and if it was beigger there would be more wages to increase pay for the decent players or use for transfers. the wage structure is based on total wages for everyone, not a limit for 1 person

    Reply
  • kimathi ikiugu
    2 years ago

    Wenger is de best man 4 de job bt he shd do awy with underperfoming players.

    Reply
  • Juyb
    2 years ago

    For the amount of money with waste on mediocrity we could have built our own galacticos!

    Reply