The best way to describe Arsenal’s last two performances is that they simply turned up, although that’s definitely up for debate. There was nothing of a side who are capable of tearing through a defence and looking well inside that circle of teams who play good football. It was typically un-Arsenal, yet it was something supporters have become more and more used to over the past six years.

A number of people, including me, talked up the decision to move Gervinho into the central role and offer the team a different option going into games. Arsenal’s problem was that they were too predictable, too easy to defend against and had little imagination when nothing seemed to be coming off. Why then wouldn’t the manager opt for something a little different to act as alternative to Olivier Giroud?

The problem is, the game against Southampton, where Gervinho scored two and looked to be moving forward, was a one off, a fluke, a mask for what he really is. The player is not suited to leading the line for a team like Arsenal, nor is he good enough to play in the starting XI each week. But it’s not something that really falls in line with Arsene Wenger failing to land on his ideal XI. With Arsenal, you can never bank on a set of players becoming regulars over the course of the season; the probability for injury is simply too high.

Jack Wilshere, Lukas Podolski, Bacary Sagna and Mikel Arteta are among those who should be in the XI when all available. Abou Diaby might be an option too, and Kieran Gibbs is certainly the better choice over Andre Santos. But Wenger has become so over reliant on players with terrible injury records that it’s impossible to compliment Podolski or Santi Cazorla with quality each week.

When there is one weak link in the side, even while the surrounding players are capable of producing good performances, that one player comes to the fore and it’s obvious to see that they are bringing the rest of the side down. It was an issue when Wenger had Cesc Fabregas and Robin van Persie in his side and his decision not to supplement their qualities with players who matched up to what they were capable of. Instead, the manager persisted and continues to persist with those who are not up to the task. Instead of players like Santos or Gervinho—and there are a number of others to add to the list—becoming passengers, they act as an anchor which weighs down and slows the rest of the team.

It’s a combination of factors which sees Wenger stand in an unwavering position of confidence towards certain individuals and also not having his best options available. I’m sure the manager is aware that he can’t bank on his best players to stay fit all season, but he doesn’t want to move on those who have clearly not impressed. There are opportunities to strengthen and create a stronger team, but his best XI is a high concentration of good players with hints of those who contribute very little. It’s the classic “I don’t want to kill Denilson by buying a player who is better.”

It’s also worth pointing to the manager’s lack of desire to make the best of the players he does have available. As mentioned, it’s always good to have different options when facing different styles of opposition, and plenty of Arsenal fans have bemoaned the lack of a plan B. But are all these players suited to the current formation the manager wants to play?

Yes, there are a good number of players in the squad who work best to a 4-3-3 formation or some variation of it. However, as mentioned, there is always likely to be one or two who weigh the whole team down by not really fitting into the system. Sometimes you’ve got to wonder if Wenger buys his players with his desired tactics in mind or if it’s just a case of “he’ll do because the price is right.”

There’s no doubt that Arsenal should see an increase in fortunes on the pitch when Jack Wilshere returns and is able to partner Arteta and Cazorla. There’s purpose with those three in the middle; they all know what their roles are, and are all undoubtedly players of excellent quality. But when one drops out, the midfield becomes incredibly weak and lacking in direction. Although, Diaby can be a very good option when available—which is rarely.

Many are still firmly on side with Aaron Ramsey, and the majority are still incredibly sympathetic following his injury at Stoke. But he’s yet to totally convince when playing in the centre in a midfield three. He has plenty of work rate and has a lot of fight about him. But the question should be whether he compliments the other attackers well enough?

Gervinho, for example, is one of the prime reasons for Arsenal’s slow and sluggish attack. When Arsenal advocate this particular style of play, they need to use a quick and decisive attack to make it effective. But Gervinho doesn’t seem to know what to do at the best of times. He lacks vision to play in others, has awful ball control and doesn’t have any faith in his own ability to shoot. It’s still a shock that he’s currently the team’s top scorer.

Arsene Wenger does know his best XI, of that I’m very much convinced. The problem is his desire to mix quality with not very good. The injuries will always play a part, but he shows far too much faith in players who do little other than drag the rest of the team down. It shouldn’t be a great secret that once you dig past the good players in Arsenal’s best starting XI—Podolski, Arteta, Cazorla, Sagna, Szczesny etc—the rest of the squad doesn’t really raise much confidence.

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • CROoney
    2 years ago

    Impressive ! So much blabbering yet not a single mention of the main Arsenal problem during the years ! Defense ! As long as they don’t have a world class keeper and a world class centre back(s), they won’t win anything. By anthing I mean PL title or the CL. You simply can’t win anything big with sczezny, koscielny,mertesacker,gibbs,jenkinson etc. This is a typical Arsenal article – focus on how ti improvew your attack yet defense wins you trophies. Every team that has won any major title in previous season had a world class defensive players and/or defensive midfielder

    Reply
    • chris from Cambridge
      2 years ago

      Correct. And we now read Bould is NOT being allowed the time to continue drilling the defence – an allegation which I for one fully believe. The Wenger Crusade for beautiful attacking football and a flat wage policy has failed and will continue to fail till 2014 when he (hopefully) will step down. Remember these are Wenger policies NOT the Directors’.

      Reply
    • Thomas Hallett
      2 years ago

      Ok firstly, there is nothing wrong with any of the three centre-backs at Arsenal. Nor is there anything wrong with the options at right-back. But when Santos replaces the first choice Gibbs at left-back, the rest of the back line crumbles. He’s a weak link, which is what I mentioned in the article.

      Vito Mannone is another, and even though Szczesny may not be world class, he brings much more to the team.

      You talk about the problem Arsenal have with their defence, and it’s a fair point. But the biggest problem will always be their lack of ability to score goals in every game. One shot on target in their last two games is a shocking stat for a team like Arsenal.

      Even Barcelona have a mess of a defence at the moment, but they’ll always be confident of outscoring their opponent.

      Reply
  • edu
    2 years ago

    So much critism of Gervinho. He already has a couple of goals.
    What has Ramsey contributed to the team so far?

    Reply
    • Thomas Hallett
      2 years ago

      I’ve mentioned both, but Gervinho remains in the team despite being awful. He slows the attack down and really doesn’t seem to be in control. Ramsey is able to contribute, but as mentioned, he still hasn’t convinced from a central position. His best games so far this season have been from the right wing.

      Reply
  • James Morgan
    2 years ago

    It’s obvious to all but Wenger the gunners take ages to shoot from outside the box.If you watch the highlights on the BBc,you’ ll see how other teams score.They don’t wastte time passing all over the box.That’s the crucial difference.The laboured victory over QPR shows offensively the gunnersar stale.
    Next stop the red faced. The red faced specialse in a swift counter attack.He has players who can kill off Arsenal. The Big German will be exposed as a lumebring giant if he plays next week.
    I would be most happy with apoint though the FM always plays in an attacking style. 8-2 is unlikely but you nevr know.

    Reply
  • Mohd Isa
    2 years ago

    What Crooney says is correct. The gunners have a young goalie.The other big teams have top notch and experinced ones.Yes I know the gunner goalie will become top,top,top, quality in the future.The present is the priority.Make sure your 2013 team is top quality.
    The big German maybe good but he is vulnerable against atop speedy forward and can beturned easily.
    As of Oct 2013,the team is still one in the works compared to other top teams who are set to win trophies.This is due to Wenger’s flawed policy of buying for the future.
    If the gunners are relegated to Eurpa status,he shdbe off.

    Reply