The January transfer window looks set to cast a shadow over Goodison Park, with the media spotlight focusing upon demoralising departures rather than potential new arrivals. The influential duo of Marouane Fellaini and Leighton Baines will be a constant source of speculation as the club reluctantly begins to batten down the hatches.

Former PSG striker Guillaume Hoarau had been linked with a cut-price move to Merseyside, but his decision to shun Everton in favour of a lucrative move to the Far East highlights the persuasive power of financial incentive. David Moyes recently revealed that his transfer budget is “only enough to get me a loan deal,” which will serve as a crushing blow to their Champions League aspirations.

There is a genuine fear that a top four finish is the only thing that can prevent a mass exit in the summer, with the likes of Baines and Fellaini currently mulling over their future. Chairman Bill Kenwright is a dedicated fan, but his inability to inject the same level of investment as his foreign adversaries, has forced the club to repeatedly defy expectation. However, even if he were able to provide a blank cheque, would Moyes flourish or be hampered by his new-found fiscal freedom?

Moyes’ reputation has been boosted recently by the shrewd captures of Kevin Mirallas and Nikica Jelavic alongside useful freebies Steven Naismith and Thomas Hitzlsperger. However, his spending hasn’t always been as fruitful and if we examine the prominent purchases – those over £5m – the resounding feeling is one of regret.

Before Moyes struck gold with Jelavic, he blew a collective £25m on James Beattie, Yakubu and Andy Johnson. Although the latter was sold for a profit and the Yak made a promising start, there can be no denying that these signings failed to merit their inflated price tag.

In 2009, Moyes dropped around £10m to bring defensive rearguards Sylvain Distin and John Heitinga to the club. While both centre-backs were perfectly competent signings, they pale in comparison to the value-for-money purchases of Phil Jagielka (£4m) and Joleon Lescott (£2.5m). Things certainly look less rosy when you throw in the name Diniyar Bilyaletdinov and consider the fact that Everton effectively paid Spurs £2m to take Steven Pienaar on loan for a year.

However, the fiery Scot has proved a formidable bargain hunter during his decade in charge. His former midfield maestros Tim Cahill and Mikel Arteta were both signed for a mere £2m while Moyes has showcased a certain penchant for reviving the fortunes of those struggling at Old Trafford. His ability to transform the likes of Phil Neville, Tim Howard and Darron Gibson is perhaps one of many reasons he’s been tipped to succeed Sir Alex Ferguson.

In many ways the diminutive batch of players at Moyes’ disposal has helped create the formidable force they are today. There is a strong sense of cohesion in the squad, bereft of any obstructive egos and while many top flight managers insist on a rigorous rotation policy, Moyes is busy promoting the benefits of a consistent and recognised starting XI.

This season, Everton are on course to resume their position on the European stage and have shown on many occasions that they can compete with the Premier League elite. Their opening day victory over Manchester United was no fluke and the club has gone on to beat fellow high flyers Tottenham while also securing an impressive point at the Etihad. In fact, their only defeat against a ‘top’ side came against Chelsea, with the team heavily weakened by injuries, tired legs and suspensions.

If stories emanating from the rumour mill hold any truth, Chelsea will soon activate Fellaini’s buyout clause, just as they did with Demba Ba. The pressure will then fall upon Moyes to replace such a unique threat, but with debts hovering around the £45m mark, the likelihood is that Everton will once again have to dig deep into their prosperous youth academy.

It seems as though the Toffees are destined to playout the familiar tale of ‘so close, yet so far’.


What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • Neil Shanahan
    2 years ago

    You truly are a buffoon. The fact that you mentioned Johnson leaving for a profit, and that Distin and Heitinga were both solid purchases, and then go on to base those as negatives to back up your own weak argument is pathetic. By the way Lescott cost 5m same as Distin and is a poorer defender in a lot of peoples eyes. City’s purchase of him at a ridiculous amount does not prove otherwise. You have also conveniently ignored Fellaini for 15m and Baines being the most expensive defender at 6m. Hopeless piece of journalism. Of course tthe man would do better if he was given more money. He would buy better players. Look at the ones he missed out on, Moutinho, Ba, Hazard, Ramsey (all genuine targets that were contacted many years before they came to prominence but money was too scarce). More importantly, stacks of money like Chelsea, City, Utd. gives you a better chance of holding onto players as you will be more competitive on the pitch and in wages. Arteta, Rooney, and even Lescott and Rodwell would improve the side and squad no end. You’re article is drivel.

    Reply
    • Will Taylor
      2 years ago

      Money doesn’t automatically success, just look at QPR. I was merely pointing out how a flurry of expensive signings would perhaps upset the balance at Everton and destabilise the squad harmony. Also you can players whatever you want but unfortunately clubs like Everton will never be as attractive as the likes of United, Chelsea etc.

      Reply
      • Neil Shanahan
        2 years ago

        Everton are not QPR. They have a richer history than Chelsea and would be in that bracket if given the same money. City are there with a poorer manager and a lesser history than Everton. Count the league titles (more than both clubs). Chelsea and City are bigger attractions because of money. You’ve only backed up my argument by your comments.

        Reply
  • Darren
    2 years ago

    Agree 100% with Neil Shanahan !

    Reply
  • Vivek Bhalla
    2 years ago

    This article portrays a very skewed perspective of Moyes’ £5m+ signings.

    There is no mention of club record signing Fellaini nor Baines – both highly sought after and coveted by major clubs around Europe.

    Andy Johnson was sold for a profit and his time at Everton was a success. His move to Fulham less so but that demonstrates Moyes astuteness in terms of knowing when to extract maximum market value for a player. Other player sales that fall into this bracket include Lescott and Arteta.

    Heitinga was last year’s player of the season and a World Cup finalist. This season has been mixed by his standards however he too would likely command a profitable transfer fee. Mirallas and Jelavic would also command greater fees now than when they were purchased.

    Distin has proved particularly dependable and a more than adequate replacement for Lescott for a fraction of the price. Far from a ‘failure’.

    Beattie, Yakubu and Bilyaletdinov are the only £5m+ signings you have mentioned that can be termed as disappointments with any degree of credibility. For two of these players, half of their original transfer fee was recouped.

    Strangely, you also mentioned Pienaar. The player’s desire to leave forced Moyes hand however he was never purchased for more than £5m anyway so the issue is irrelevant to the point you attempting to validate.

    This article appears inconsistent based on the above points.

    Reply