<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A £22m transfer steal for Liverpool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/a-22m-transfer-steal-for-liverpool/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/a-22m-transfer-steal-for-liverpool</link>
	<description>Football Blogs, Football News &#38; Football Podcasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:38:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelazynative</title>
		<link>http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/a-22m-transfer-steal-for-liverpool/comment-page-1#comment-293227</link>
		<dc:creator>thelazynative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballfancast.com/?p=203416#comment-293227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for these views, Christy. A few things: we can agree that LFC has paid too much for players in recent times and that the structure of the contracts has encumbered the club with high running costs. Some of this was down to the inexperience of FSG. Some of it was down to Dalglish&#039;s strange interpretation of how a modern football team needs to be constructed. Some of it was to do with agents realizing the club was spending above market rates and taking advantage of it. And then some of it was purely circumstantial, LFC paid 35m for Carroll because Newcastle new it was cash rich after the sale of Torres to Chelsea for 50m. If LFC had received less for Torres, NUFC would have received less for Carroll.

Separate from valuation are the issues of potential and performance themselves. Carroll is a good player but not the sort you see any more at the pinnacle of club football. At a huge stretch he may resemble Christian Vieri one day. Big, powerful, quite dainty with his feet, etc. Not sure if he has Vieri&#039;s footballing brain though. Henderson was also over-valued but is a different proposition altogether. He is showing signs of becoming a player of real substance: powerful, tactically sound, good distribution and with the capacity to take matters into his own hands. He&#039;s only 22, so let him grow into a man first and then we can see is real worth. Borini has been terribly unlucky with injuries but you don&#039;t get into a Euro final national squad by being a duff player. Downing was unlucky and then wretched last season but has become rather more effective this time round. Still not a world beater and definitely not worth 20m, but is far from useless. Compare him to Ashley Young, who went to The Scum at the same time (for 5m less). How has he fared? A few more goals and then nowt to write about.

The restructuring of contracts, the refusal to yield to agents&#039; demands, the purchase of very good players at decent prices (Sturridge, Coutinho), all suggest the club is being altogether more prudent now. So no more Coles, Aquilanis, etc. There will continue to be mistakes or things that don&#039;t work out. Players may come to LFC and not like living in the Merseyside area. They may end up not liking the culture of the club. Their families might not settle in either. It&#039;s amazing anything goes write with all the things that can go wrong. The important thing through all of this is that LFC seems to be heading into a more sensible and sustainable approach, which is key to restoring long-term stability as a foundation for success.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these views, Christy. A few things: we can agree that LFC has paid too much for players in recent times and that the structure of the contracts has encumbered the club with high running costs. Some of this was down to the inexperience of FSG. Some of it was down to Dalglish&#8217;s strange interpretation of how a modern football team needs to be constructed. Some of it was to do with agents realizing the club was spending above market rates and taking advantage of it. And then some of it was purely circumstantial, LFC paid 35m for Carroll because Newcastle new it was cash rich after the sale of Torres to Chelsea for 50m. If LFC had received less for Torres, NUFC would have received less for Carroll.</p>
<p>Separate from valuation are the issues of potential and performance themselves. Carroll is a good player but not the sort you see any more at the pinnacle of club football. At a huge stretch he may resemble Christian Vieri one day. Big, powerful, quite dainty with his feet, etc. Not sure if he has Vieri&#8217;s footballing brain though. Henderson was also over-valued but is a different proposition altogether. He is showing signs of becoming a player of real substance: powerful, tactically sound, good distribution and with the capacity to take matters into his own hands. He&#8217;s only 22, so let him grow into a man first and then we can see is real worth. Borini has been terribly unlucky with injuries but you don&#8217;t get into a Euro final national squad by being a duff player. Downing was unlucky and then wretched last season but has become rather more effective this time round. Still not a world beater and definitely not worth 20m, but is far from useless. Compare him to Ashley Young, who went to The Scum at the same time (for 5m less). How has he fared? A few more goals and then nowt to write about.</p>
<p>The restructuring of contracts, the refusal to yield to agents&#8217; demands, the purchase of very good players at decent prices (Sturridge, Coutinho), all suggest the club is being altogether more prudent now. So no more Coles, Aquilanis, etc. There will continue to be mistakes or things that don&#8217;t work out. Players may come to LFC and not like living in the Merseyside area. They may end up not liking the culture of the club. Their families might not settle in either. It&#8217;s amazing anything goes write with all the things that can go wrong. The important thing through all of this is that LFC seems to be heading into a more sensible and sustainable approach, which is key to restoring long-term stability as a foundation for success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
