<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The changing rules of the transfer market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/the-changing-rules-of-the-transfer-market/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/the-changing-rules-of-the-transfer-market</link>
	<description>Football Blogs, Football News &#38; Football Podcasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc CFC/BKK</title>
		<link>http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/the-changing-rules-of-the-transfer-market/comment-page-1#comment-270261</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc CFC/BKK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballfancast.com/?p=197469#comment-270261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be fair, a thought provoking and interesting article. Yes, at the end of the day, if a club, whether through owner, director of football or other (Emanalo); choose to buy a sufficient crop of good talent then any half decent manager should make it work, you&#039;d think...I do however, believe in the smaller picture - ie - what if said manager simply doesn&#039;t click with said  &#039;class&#039; player, a la Mourinho alot it would seem. In other words, yes it can work but the manager should always have input and at least get to meet the potential signing before a deal is completed. We&#039;ve all had scenarios in life where it should work but simply doesn&#039;t with people who work well with others but not all. A squad of 22-25 sounds alot but in working life it simply isn&#039;t but a big load of personalities managed by one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, a thought provoking and interesting article. Yes, at the end of the day, if a club, whether through owner, director of football or other (Emanalo); choose to buy a sufficient crop of good talent then any half decent manager should make it work, you&#8217;d think&#8230;I do however, believe in the smaller picture &#8211; ie &#8211; what if said manager simply doesn&#8217;t click with said  &#8216;class&#8217; player, a la Mourinho alot it would seem. In other words, yes it can work but the manager should always have input and at least get to meet the potential signing before a deal is completed. We&#8217;ve all had scenarios in life where it should work but simply doesn&#8217;t with people who work well with others but not all. A squad of 22-25 sounds alot but in working life it simply isn&#8217;t but a big load of personalities managed by one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sickof cretins</title>
		<link>http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/the-changing-rules-of-the-transfer-market/comment-page-1#comment-270252</link>
		<dc:creator>sickof cretins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballfancast.com/?p=197469#comment-270252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the term&quot;reportedly&quot; concerning the feelings of AVB. Now let&#039;s translate &quot;reportedly&quot; into real English. It means there are no quotes or evidence-just the scurrilous myths(AKA baseless assumptions?) made up by wannabe journalists to create a story. Oh for the days before the internet where writers had to put up or shut up!! Now the net allows people to publish unounded allegations as fact by remote. Sad? No -shameful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the term&#8221;reportedly&#8221; concerning the feelings of AVB. Now let&#8217;s translate &#8220;reportedly&#8221; into real English. It means there are no quotes or evidence-just the scurrilous myths(AKA baseless assumptions?) made up by wannabe journalists to create a story. Oh for the days before the internet where writers had to put up or shut up!! Now the net allows people to publish unounded allegations as fact by remote. Sad? No -shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
