Newcastle’s 3-0 win over Wigan at home this week cannot be underestimated, but the fact that most were talking about the game beforehand in the terms that their season needed ‘saving’ tells you everything you need to know about how it’s gone for the club this term. However, can the root cause of all of their problems be best attributed by a failure to invest significantly over the summer?

The club’s fifth-placed finish last season made them the surprise package of the top flight and presented manager Alan Pardew with an opportunity to really go on an establish the side in the top six, with so many of their rivals at that end of the table in a state of transition. Instead, they simply dragged their heels during negotiations for the likes of Mathieu Debuchy, Douglas and Luuk De Jong and they only managed to secure the versatile Vurnon Anita who has gone on to make any sort of impact on the starting eleven.

Living up to the standards set during last season’s fantastic fifth-placed league finish was always going to be an impossible task, and there’s a certain sense of inevitability about their struggles so far this campaign as they sit 14th in the table, just five points above the drop zone. The Wigan victory was the first that the club have managed to secure in the Premier League since Alan Pardew was bizarrely awarded with a new eight-year contract. The club’s hierarchy of Mike Ashley and Derek Llambias, even when it seemed impossible to, have managed to make a huge muddle of a great opportunity by getting their priorities completely wrong.

Securing a yes-man on a longer deal was not the main thing to take away from last term’s success. Ashley is clearly delighted that he has finally found a manager willing to work within the financial parameters that he’s set out; one who will continually back the club’s transfer policy to the press under pressure, yet you have to question the length of the deal in the climate of the modern game, with turnover so high. Any slump in form like the one just endured again in the future will only increase the pressure on Ashley to make a decision on Pardew and while an eight-year deal protects the club should anyone else come sniffing around in terms of compensation, it works both ways and should they need to sack him, it will be costly, needlessly so too, seeing as there was no real pressure to hand him a new deal in the first place.

They signed just four players in the summer, with only Anita making the grade so far – Romain Amalfitano has yet to make a first league start, despite the injuries and added fixtures in Europe necessitating rotation, and at 23 years of age, you’d like to think that he’d be ready by now, while Curtis Good  and Gael Bigirimana are both considered good prospects for the future. Failing to be held to ransom in the transfer market was deemed a positive approach at the time, but it is seriously costing them now and they look ill-equipped to compete on multiple fronts at once.

Pardew told Sky last week: “We have been unlucky but we are in the process of analysing whether we under-cooked it [the transfer window] and that’s what we should do. It would be silly not to. It’s increased the discussion mode on that. We obviously had an idea of where it was going to go but it probably is going to change before we get there. It’s very important just to keep our eye on the ball.”

They haven’t been helped this season by a small squad trying to compete in Europe and at home, and every injury or suspension to a first-team member has been keenly felt, while the form of several key performers such as Cabaye, Cisse and Tiote isn’t at quite the same level as it was last term, with only really Demba Ba stepping up to the plate in a similar fashion. Coupled with the needless tinkering of a winning formation, reverting back to a traditional 4-4-2 that doesn’t sit as easy with the players as the fluid 4-3-3 they used last year, and they’ve simply succeeded in making a mountain out of an avoidable molehill; snatching regression from the jaws of progress.

There is obviously money there to spend should Ashley deem it worthy of investment, hence the very public pursuit of Andy Carroll, with it looking increasingly likely as if the club will move for him in the summer and it’s not as if he’ll come cheaply or for anything below £15m.

You have to question whether the club’s transfer policy under head scout Graham Carr is a sustainable one, because as soon as you start to enjoy any sort of success and clubs on the continent begin to realise what you’re doing, the result is that they drive their prices up for players. This is exactly what happened to Newcastle in the summer, where they bargained themselves into a standstill on both Debuchy and Douglas.

The club are short in terms of both quality and quantity and while they’ve acquitted themselves well in the Europa League so far, it’s come at a cost to their league form. A failure to invest in the right areas in the summer was not only ill-judged but unforgivable and as a result, the club are going backwards, looking nervously over their shoulders at the drop zone when for all intents and purposes, it looked like the dawning of a new, successful era on Tyneside last season.

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • jim
    1 year ago

    total greed in not payin for debuchy, douglas etc-clueless board who had looked as if they had improved, but have ruined it now-idiots-well done

    Reply
  • franky
    1 year ago

    tell us something we dont already know?

    Reply
  • Peter
    1 year ago

    Garbage article. Now claims NUFC over achieved last year. Now criticises Pardew’s reappointment, Now denegrates Carr’s recruiting. Now writes off NUFCs season. All in half-blinded hindsight. But, like always, you have to wait until the end of the campaign to judge its successes and failures. Instead of your shallow broadside at the club, how about chosing just one of these issues and analysing it in some real depth – or is that too much like professional journalism for you. Gutter-snipe.

    Reply
    • James McManus
      1 year ago

      Peter, I’ll try to run through your oh so eloquently put points below.

      1. Do you dispute that Newcastle over-achieved last season then? By common consensus, they were tipped for mid-table, with several predicting a relegation battle. Finishing 5th is clearly higher than anyone – fans, players or even the manager would have dreamed of prior to the start of the season. It’s difficult to argue anything other than that, really, but, y’know, you seem an expert on hindsight, so….

      2. I’ve been consistent in my criticism of Alan Pardew being awarded an eight-year deal, as it shows here – http://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/newcastle-united/a-bizarre-deal-at-newcastle-united
      It makes so little sense in the modern climate and it’s truly baffling. If you disagree, then fair enough, but there’s a reason no other club does it or will do in the future. The risks are too great when stacked up against the rewards. Stability is obviously something nearly every club would like to work towards, but why not simply offer him a four-year one in that case? There’s no logical explanation regarding the length whatsoever.

      3. The criticism of Carr’s and the club’s recruitment policy is not aimed at the players that they’ve brought in with it – Cabaye, Tiote, Cisse – rather the fact that it’s simply not sustainable as clubs get wise to it, hence the main reason for their struggles this summer with negotiating good prices for players with potential.

      Where I would also disagree is the fact that Carr ‘found’ these players – Cisse was the top goalscorer in the Bundeliga, Cabaye had just won the French league title and Tiote represented Ivory Coast at the 2010 World Cup. Where they deserve credit is for taking the risk on them in the first place where others wouldn’t, but they hardly unearthed them from nowhere.

      4. “All in half-blinded hindsight”

      I argued a similar point here – http://www.footballfancast.com/football-blogs/newcastle-continually-drag-their-feet-in-the-transfer-market – on July 31st. Newcastle’s first league game took place at home to Tottenham on August 18th.

      I hope that clears things up for you a tad more. Gutter-snipe indeed.

      Reply
  • James Jones
    1 year ago

    Now that’s what I call silencing your critics.

    Reply
  • raz
    1 year ago

    this is an obviously emotional time for every newcastle fan, so the comments are obviously emotional. let’s not take any of these emotionally. the lesson: if you cannot stand the heat, don’t go into the kitchen.

    Reply

Related Articles:

Chelsea plot player-exchange deal with Southampton
West Ham boss believes fans still on his side
Rodgers backs Liverpool to challenge for the title
Ex-Man City boss wants Tottenham job
West Brom ace slams club's decision to sell striker