One of the fears from many supporters of the game is that the art of tackling will be outlawed for one reason or another. Football has the history of being an aggressive game, but the ambiguity surrounding what is an acceptable tackle is taking away a vital dynamic that has made it such a joy for most.

Everyone has their opinion about what is a dangerous tackle and what is an exceptional example of that side of the game. The Paolo Maldinis are not bone crunchers, but the Italian remains one of the finest defenders we’ve seen. The biggest problem about the whole debate is the word ‘opinion’ and that most people – including referees – make their decision based on what they believe to be within the rules of the game.

Vincent Kompany’s tackle on Jack Wilshere two weeks ago became a hot topic for debate, and it’s not the first time the Manchester City captain’s tackling has sparked serious discussion. The argument in favour of Kompany is that he got the ball, while also carrying through onto Wilshere. So what’s the problem?

The issue is we don’t really know what we’re looking for. Yes, a few decades ago the debate and the boundaries of the rules had greater clarity. Now, do we punish tacklers for following through on the opposition player? Some would say Kompany’s tackle could have been dangerous had he got it wrong, but then why would Manchester City win their appeal?

What about the reaction of the player who is in possession of the ball? That brings into question another debate on diving or feigning injury, but it really does distort the view when at first glances a tackle looks to be a good one.

On that occasion, none of the Arsenal players protested; none of the Manchester City players expected much to come from the referee. So who really knows the rules? How can players compete if one week a dangerous tackle is deemed acceptable, yet the following week a strong but clean tackle is viewed as a red card offence?

Incidentally, there was a passage of play during Barcelona’s game against Malaga on the same weekend, where Javier Mascherano flew in to challenge Diego Buonanotte with a strong tackle which did leave the Malaga midfielder on the deck. It was a strong tackle but it was equally an excellent tackle. Mascherano went through the player but there was no doubt that he took all of the ball. It was notably one-footed and the referee had no hesitation about letting play carry on.

Now, it’s one thing to talk about foreign leagues coming down heavier on tackles, but a good tackle remains a good tackle no matter where it takes place. Mascherano’s challenge could have been dangerous considering the speed at which he came in, but then that raises the point that tackling is an art form perfected by some, and one to be admired. The greater problem here is that referees are calling a lot of their decisions on the fly.

And I’m not sure that ex-professionals don’t really help the cause either. Yes, they give their view on whether Kompany should have been sent off, for example. But do we ever get a definitive answer on what is an acceptable tackle in the modern game? One ex-pro will give their opinion – again, opinion, not precise rule of the game – and the following week another ex-pro will give a totally contrasting view. What if you bring together two footballers who played in the early nineties but in two different leagues? Doesn’t that just create further problems on what is a good tackle and what isn’t?

Tackling remains a pride of the English game, but it’s not something other nations particularly regard as highly. There’s a case to be made that a tackle is used by lesser players, those who don’t read the game as well as others and who aren’t able to stay on their feet to intercept or halt opposition play. But that’s a view from other parts of the footballing world and one that is unlikely to sit well with many Premier League fans.

At this stage, the issue needs the intervention of football’s governing bodies. If UEFA and FIFA want to outlaw tackling then they should do so; it at least might be a little better than sitting in purgatory and arguing every other week over what are considered strong tackles and which cross the boundaries into dangerous play.


 

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • Rich
    1 year ago

    Why bother having defenders then?

    Reply
  • Craig Clinton
    1 year ago

    It’s simple. It don’t matter anymore if you win the ball. If you are too forceful, off the ground or showing studs it is deemed dangerous and a foul and/or card is produced. I don’t understand where the grey area is. Football is an objective sport and if it wasn’t then I would not be writing this

    Reply
  • toffee
    1 year ago

    Seems the majority of these ‘unlawful’ challenges involve the offending player leading with his studs, so just change the laws so that ANY challenge which in the ref’s opinion is studs-first gets a yellow card. There’d be no ambiguity then.

    The game’s so fast these days that wrong decisions are inevitable, and teams should be allowed to challenge 1 or 2 decisions per half/game by way of a video review of the incident during the game – seems to work in rugby, cricket, tennis, etc – but I guess that’s another question for another day.

    Reply
    • Towson Tom
      1 year ago

      You are right about the speed of the game, but any refs decision involving a card should be challenge-able by the captain only (if the player involved challenges he should lose challenge unless he is the captain) the short delay would be worth it. the same should apply to any decision involving goal/no goal situations and pen / no pen situations.

      Reply
  • M19 Blue
    1 year ago

    Good article, but I must take issue with your point that Kompany follows through on Wilshire, it was Wilshire who followed through and fouled Kompany.

    Reply
  • Me
    1 year ago

    Platini doesn’t like tackling, get rid of him and players will be able to play proper football again.

    Reply

Related Articles:

FIVE 'January signings' to give Liverpool the needed depth
Liverpool legend urges United to stick with struggling Moyes
World class pair set for Manchester United move
Pardew gives warning to loanee forward
Twitter reacts to Man City star's injury v Liverpool