To describe Chelsea and Liverpool’s start to the season as ‘turbulent’ would be an understatement. Both sides possess sizeable squads littered with talent and yet both have so far struggled to meet the fluctuating expectations placed at their feet.

At Liverpool, Luis Suarez provides the only genuinely reliable presence in an ever-evolving team, which is stark contrast to Chelsea, who have discovered their most valuable asset is in fact their weakest link. This begs the question, should both clubs risk ridicule and recall Andy Carroll and Romelu Lukaku to improve their ailing fortunes?

The modern loan transfer arrangement is a complex beast, complicated by the intricate financial details associated with each deal. However, despite the defiance of West Ham and the reluctance of West Brom, I can’t see how they could prevent the parent team from extracting their respective players in January, even if they had to dig deep into their wallets to do so.

Sir Alex Ferguson recently dubbed Brendan Rodgers naïve for allowing Carroll to depart without a confirmed replacement already on his way. While this was an obvious attempt to goad his favourite rivals, it’s difficult to contest his assessment.

Liverpool dithered over their valuation of Fulham star Clint Dempsey to such an extent that the Cottagers launched a complaint in protest of their transfer antics. As deadline day reached its climax, Tottenham swooped in the eleventh hour, highlighting how quickly a deal could and should have been done. In the meantime Andy Carroll had already signed on the dotted line with Sam Allardyce, leaving Brendan Rodgers to rue a series of bad judgement calls.

Rodgers may have fallen foul of false promises concerning incoming reinforcements, but he only has himself to blame for the way he handled Andy Carroll. First he was a valued member of the squad, then a back up, before reverting to his original stance when respectable offers failed to flood his inbox.

His constant stream of contradiction was epitomised when he revealed it ‘would take a special offer’ for him to allow his burly target man to depart on loan. In reality, all it required was a relatively measly £1m loan fee plus the bulk of his wages from the bank of Gold and Sullivan. Hardly an exceptional offer and one that Rodgers would certainly turn down looking back, but then again hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Rodgers only succeeded to reinforce the growing consensus that the striker has no future in Merseyside. In London however, Carroll has been treated like the £35m striker Liverpool once thought he was. He has thrived in a team that harbours no apprehension in resorting the direct style of football that will utilise his best assets. Alongside Kevin Nolan, his partner in crime, the Hammers have hustled and bustled their way up the league and currently sit three places above the Reds in the table.

Many devout Liverpool supporters have echoed Rodgers’ opinion that Carroll is incapable of conforming to his new passing philosophy. However I would argue that he doesn’t need to, it wouldn’t be in the teams or the player’s best interest. Carroll performs the unsightly aspects of football, the aerial duels, hold up play and set-piece defending, incredibly effectively. Just imagine how Luis Suarez or Raheem Sterling would benefit from the increased number of flick-ons or free-kicks that Carroll could manufacture.

Granted, Liverpool need a proven goalscorer in their ranks but while Carroll’s record this season is far from spectacular, he has never been prolific throughout his career. In the unlikely event that both parties agree to cancel their arrangement, I fear the bridge back to Merseyside may have already been burnt beyond repair.

Over at the Hawthorns, Steve Clarke has masterminded a remarkable start to the season, with the club sitting perilously close to the Champions League places. The former Chelsea assistant has managed to get the best from the diverse attacking trio of Shane Long, Peter Odemwingie and the on-loan Romelu Lukaku.

At just 19-years-old, the Belgium international has already been tipped for stardom and has flourished in his new, less demanding surroundings. The comparisons to Didier Drogba may be somewhat premature but they are not without merit. His robust, powerful presence is perhaps the only element lacking in the current Chelsea strikeforce.

Interim-manager Rafael Benitez was quick to dismiss speculation of a potential recall and instead insisted that it was best if the player continued his development elsewhere. However, while this is completely understandable, there is the underlying feeling that the Spaniard has been bought in with the primary task of restoring the faltering Fernando Torres, and Lukaku’s return would certainly hinder that process.

With the club set to depart for the Club World Cup after their match against Sunderland, there will be real onus on Torres to rediscover his form against significantly inferior opponents. Failure to impress will surely force the club to consider their options, especially if Benitez refuses to remain contempt with this babysitting gig and instead wants to make a real go if it, for his sake as much as the clubs.

When the two sides met in November to contest a particularly uninspiring 1-1 draw, statistics showed that the average height of both starting line-ups didn’t exceed six foot. Carroll and Lukaku could provide the strong aerial presence both sides seem to require and while both clubs have been linked with unproven transfer targets from foreign shores, perhaps its time they took advantage of the players already at their disposal.

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN THE NEW ENGLAND KIT

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • Andy
    1 year ago

    I don’t support either team so no axe to grind. But, I think Liverpool have done pretty well in the circumstances. They need a forward but otherwise seem to be progressing ok if not exactly setting the world on fire. You sound like an Arsenal fan deflecting criticism from their own club.

    Reply
    • Will Taylor
      1 year ago

      Liverpool have done pretty well under the circumstances??

      They’re 11th in the table, beneath both Stoke and Arsenal, who’ve had their worst start under Arsene Wenger. Liverpool are the architects of their own downfall, yes they’re undergoing a transitional period but they’re paying the price for a series of terrible decisions.

      Reply
      • Chris
        1 year ago

        Old news yawn…
        Must be a slow week to regurgitate this stuff from the end of August.

        Move on please…. next

        Reply
        • Will Taylor
          1 year ago

          Not quite sure how this can be considered ‘old news’ when the article focuses on whether either side should recall their striker in January, i.e. the future.

          Reply
  • James
    1 year ago

    Rodgers and Tom Werner have already admitted mistakes were made!
    You did Google before you wrote this piece didn’t you? 2nd September to be precise!

    Reply
    • Will Taylor
      1 year ago

      I think you’re too pre-occupied with the article’s headline. It’s one thing to admit your mistakes, but another to act on them.

      I don’t think either club has the stones to recall their players, even though it would significantly improve their attacking options.

      Reply
  • EastCoastRed
    1 year ago

    i’ll be honest i’m a Liverpool Supporter but being on this side of the pond gives me great perspective. All smart reds supporters know we are in transition. We need a a striker or 2 and believe it or not we need another defensive midfielder(to back up Lucas). I’m not expecting Champions league next season, with that said the league is down this year and we are only 7 points back of 4th. We may not be pulling up trees but we are progressing. Chelsea has no excuse except for having a wealthy owner with an itchy trigger finger.

    Reply
  • Rhys
    1 year ago

    How do Liverpool have a sizeable squad. They have a small squad and have had to promote youngsters probably too quickly. People go on about they should recall Carroll but when he was there he didn’t score the goals. This isn’t the best of articles.

    Reply
    • Will Taylor
      1 year ago

      Point taken, but I think Liverpool’s squad is made to look smaller than it is, simply by Rodgers’ refusal to utilise the players at his disposal.

      The likes of Cole, Downing, Henderson, Assaidi & Yeşil haven’t been able to impress this season because they haven’t been gifted the chance to have a good run in the side.

      EastCoastRed mentioned above that the club need another defensive midfielder, but you shipped a perfectly competent one (Spearing) off to Bolton in August. Like I mentioned above, the club are architects of their own downfall.

      Reply
      • pool4eva
        1 year ago

        Spearing competent, Will you must be talking thru your @$$

        Reply
  • colourcraftltd
    1 year ago

    Hello could I use some of the information from this site if I link back to you?

    Reply

Related Articles:

Newcastle hoping to beat Man United to playmaker
SIX world class transfers to solve Chelsea's 'striker problem'
Stoke boss backs hitman for World Cup place
Manchester City midfielder was 'shocked' at dreadful Manchester United
Angry Arsenal fan claims striker is worst in 42 years