Andre Villas-Boas is in the wars, that much was always going to be clear following his disappointing spell at Chelsea. But while many should be sympathetic for his situation at Tottenham, the Portuguese manager seems to fuel further fires by his distance from reality.

It became clear as soon as the summer transfer window shut that Villas-Boas would struggle to have an immediate and positive impact at White Hart Lane. He was given a high-profile goalkeeper when he really didn’t need one—at least not this season—and his primary targets slipped the net. It’s evident that his greatest need for this Spurs team was a central midfielder in the mould of Luka Modric, someone who could bring balance and a greater sense of direction on the pitch. If he’s failed to hit the ground running then it’s perfectly understandable, and the criticism and jokes should have cooled.

The problem for Villas-Boas is that he is either trying to be too clever in an environment where he’ll be caught out instantly, or that he just doesn’t want to admit defeat. He didn’t want to accept that Arsenal dominated the North London Derby for large parts, with enormous evidence coming via the final score line. It was never the right move to try and suggest otherwise, even if he didn’t believe it himself. There’s protecting your players and praising them even in defeat, and then there’s just sounding daft.

He wants to do it his way at White Hart Lane off the bat, but his time at Chelsea should have given him a nudge that it doesn’t always work that way, especially with a team who have a set way of playing. The most obvious thing to have done against Arsenal was damage limitation, make things difficult for the opposition and restrict their paths to goal, while using the natural pace in the team to find counter attacking opportunities.

Emmanuel Adebayor’s sending off was in no way the manager’s fault, and everyone would have understood if he had gone defensive. But it’s not in his nature. He doesn’t want to follow the trend, the easy option and the path well trodden. He wants to prove that the notepads and his tactical awareness count for something. Yes, it might do, but not all at once and certainly not without the right personnel.

Giving a hint that he believed Santi Cazorla to be in the wrong for being too quick is beyond ridiculous. Trying to protect Adebayor’s action when he could have accepted that it was an unnecessary challenge was also nonsensical.

He has desire and he’s driven to succeed in his own way. But he needs to take a step back and realise that you can’t always go against the grain for the sake of trying to be different. It all may come together for him in time, sending out an attractive, winning team, but it won’t happen immediately.

Villas-Boas is not the new Jose Mourinho, and while he knows that himself, he seems to be fighting against the need to doing things in a very Mourinho fashion. The Real Madrid manager can command whatever he wants, demand the keys to the Bernabeu, hook his best centre-back for an important Champions League game, receive criticism from the Madrid press, yet still receive plenty of backing.

It’s not always about PR and giving everyone what they want, but it does take up a decent measure of the job. Villas-Boas is bold and knows where he’s going. His time to make rash decisions and speak openly about topics from a questionable angle will come. But right now, the manager is really making it difficult for himself when he doesn’t need to.

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN AN IPAD

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
WIN AN IPAD

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • SP
    1 year ago

    Only he hasn’t ‘tried to doit his way’ – he specifically ‘didn’t’ play a 4-3-3 because he didn’t have the players for it. He specifically including older players even though everyone knows they won’t be here for the long term. The griping about the way he handled the Friedel/Lloris situation started BEFORE Lloris had even been able to play for Spurs (if anyone had actually bothered to check).

    Spurs lost three of their best and most influential players in the Summer, adn, on top of that have been without between 4 and 7 1st team players, for one reason and another, for most of the season, and are only two points behind Arsen*l and well within touching distance of 4th place, having played all 4 of the top teams in less than a third of the season – including 3 away (technically 3 of the 4 hardest games of the season in less than the first third of it).

    The main reason articles like this are being produced is becausse articles like this have been being produced since the first game of the season declaring that there ‘was’ some kind of ‘crisis’ – presumably because the media ‘wanted’ there to be a crisis.

    Reply
    • Buffalo NY USA Spur
      1 year ago

      Well, said. AVB wasn’t my first, second or third choice for Spurs manager. But hs is the manager and needs to be given time. Redknapp’s last 10 matches as Spurs manager produced 5-5-5 results and included must win losses to Norwich at home and getting clean sheeted at QPR. AVB’s first 12 matches see Spurs at 5-2-5 without Modric and Van der Vaart. So how much difference is the between Redknapp and AVB. At this point here’s the problem. Imagine a conversation between AVB and the Media and Disgruntled Spurs fans over what to do:
      AVB: Blue
      Fans: Red

      AVB: Red
      Fans: Blue.

      Their problem is a sily love affair with a now gone manager who choked at the end of 2 seasons in a row and they are too lagered up to admit it.

      Reply
  • East Kent Spur
    1 year ago

    I read some Sh1t on this site but you are a complete Cu*t.
    Wank*r

    Reply
  • MartinS
    1 year ago

    Damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t Plus no mention of the injuries the guy has had to cope with. Maybe you are a closet HR man, eh? Well at least QPR can throw money at him too.

    Reply
  • Faby
    1 year ago

    Must admit that I am continually besemud how Mikel gets picked and how AVB decides to take off Ramires and still leave Mikel on the pitch. He offers little or no protection to the back 4 and is not capable of turning defence into attack in any form or fashion except at a snails pace. Sturridge was woeful and missed a hatful of chances to socre or get the ball into the box. It is clear that to continue to play attacking football we will have to accept a certain weakness in the defence, however, this was unacceptable and AVB has to address this issue and soon. Much as he is a liability I feel that AVB has to find a place for Luiz and RB is as good a place tro start as at least 2 goals came from the Arsenal left side as Bos was continually exposed (to be fair Sturridge hardly tracked back so provided little support). Overall a bad day at the office but no need for panic yet, however, we cannot afford to lose many more games or conced as consistently as we did on Saturday. KTBFFH

    Reply

Related Articles:

Stoke complete double signing
SIX ridiculous Manchester United transfer rumours
Tottenham 1-0 Everton - The Twitter Match Report
With Bayern out of the picture, Arsenal can’t afford to miss out on this ace
Arsenal star wants FA Cup to save season