Liverpool to the signing of Gylfi Sigurdsson during the summer, it was rendered as something of a coup for the men from White Hart Lane.

His £8million move from Hoffenheim, off the back of a superb loan spell under Brendan Rodgers’ tutelage at Swansea last season, seemed the perfect addition to the Andre Villas-Boas revolution. Intelligent on the ball, technically astute with a great understanding of the game, Sigurdsson seemed to have the credentials to become a key component in this new look Spurs team.

Yet the story so far hasn’t quite followed the script that many seemed to have already had written. Sigurdsson has looked like a somewhat awkward part of the Tottenham Hotspur jigsaw from what we’ve seen so far and although only nine Premier League games have been played, his influence has been consigned very much to the periphery.

The Icelander certainly isn’t the only one that’s had their troubles conforming to the long-winded process of adaptation in N17, although despite his eclectic skillset, it’s not quite gone to plan so far for the Icelander. How can Spurs get the best out of Gylfi Sigurdsson?

Pre-season remains a foolish barometer to make any form of defining judgments upon either a club’s or player’s forthcoming fortunes, but Sigurdsson certainly looked like one of Spurs’ better performers.

At this point, it was still of course anyone’s guess as to what the Spurs XI would look like come the end of August, but from Tottenham’s fleeting appearances under Andre Villas-Boas in July, you would have thought that Sigurdsson would be part of it. Fans saw plenty of neat link up play and glimpses of his fabled goal scoring prowess; it was a very tentative analysis, but he looked comfortable within the 4-2-3-1 set-up that the Portuguese sought to introduce.

But as Premier League proceedings began, the reality of developing the new set-up, was given a harsh reality check by the rigors of English football. It was never going to be easy and so it proved, with Spurs looking fragile at the back and toothless at the front as the Lilywhite’s stumbled to two points in their first three games.

A harsh evaluation it may be, but the nature of Sigurdsson’s performances seemed to represent a hallmark of the team’s early season performances.  We saw plenty of industry and nice ideas, but with little substance to back any of it up. Sigurdsson looked OK against Newcastle, but a lack of any meaningful contribution when brought on against West Brom, was followed by another relatively average 56 minutes against Norwich City.

The problem for Sigurdsson was that although he wasn’t particularly doing anything wrong, he wasn’t really cultivating anything of any real note, either.

Unfortunately for the Icelander, a good showing against Reading was confounded by a difficult 45 against QPR, in which he represented the sacrificial lamb as Villas-Boas looked to repair his Gareth Bale-sized tactical cock-up. As fate would unfortunately have it for Sigurdsson, Clint Dempsey enjoyed a far more efficient second period. Since then, the American has enjoyed preferential status over Sigurdsson within Spurs’ XI. But even then, such has been the relative averageness of Dempsey’s performances; it’s hardly a position that can’t be reclaimed.

And it’s within the struggles of both the pair to negotiate much of an impact in the same position, which gives us an insight into one of the more prominent issues harming Spurs at the moment. Neither Sigurdsson nor Dempsey have profited particularly well in the central role of the attacking three behind the frontman. And maybe neither are suited to play there, either. Or not in it’s current guise.

Gylfi Sigurdsson’s best performance of the season came in the 3-1 win away to Reading and if you look at the role he played, maybe it’s no real surprise. In more of a 4-3-3 set-up, Sigurdsson, combined with Mousa Dembele and Sandro, formed a trio of real fluidity. Although he was tasked as the most attackingly minded of the three, Sigurdsson was at times the deepest lying midfielder.

Yet when he’s been played in the centre of the attacking three in the 4-2-3-1, he’s struggled to wield a similar influence, but the fielding of Jermain Defoe as the lone striker probably hasn’t helped Sigurdsson’s fate.

It’s hard to gauge quite how much difference a fully-fit Emmanuel Adebayor may make to proceedings, although the faulted credentials of Defoe’s hold-up play hardly helps the men playing behind him. Be it Dempsey or Sigurdsson, the Togolese’s efficiency at bringing others into play can only act as a positive catalyst for their performances.

It’s also worth noting that Sigurdsson hasn’t been afforded a real run of Premier League games to forge a sense of understanding, continuity and confidence within this Spurs team. The Icelander has been fit all season, yet only managed to play 90 minutes of league games once, in the 4-2 loss at home to Chelsea. He’s appeared as a sub in four of Spurs’ nine league games and his best run of three consecutive league starts were punctuated with being hauled off after 56 minutes against Norwich and 45 against QPR. A flow of real, solid game time would certainly help his cause.

Yet you get the feeling that Sigurdsson needs to really step things up a gear when he gets the chance to play behind Adebayor in the near future. His good showing against Chelsea when moved to the left was rendered somewhat redundant by the fact that he was stepping into Gareth Bale’s shoes. With the 4-2-3-1 continuing to be favoured by AVB, the monopoly of Sandro and Dembele on the deeper roles suggests Sigurdsson may find an opportunity to repeat the Reading trick a little more difficult. He has to try and make the central role his own.

You can’t help but feeling a little sympathy for Sigurdsson. His goal scoring exploits of last season ensured he carried a weight of expectations and the role he’s being asked to play simply isn’t the one that paid him such dividends during his time with Swansea. The question remains though, whether he does indeed have what it takes to play that role for Spurs. He’ll keep getting the chances to show that he does. He must ensure that he starts to take them.

What would you do with Gylfi Sigurdsson? Let me know on Twitter: follow @samuel_antrobus and tell me where you fit him in within this Spurs side. 

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


Page:
12
  • George
    2 years ago

    Sell him to Swansea and buy Mouthino.

    Reply
  • Muggins
    2 years ago

    he will be best suited to playing in the hole behind Adebeyor, the same as dempsey will, very hard to ask a player to play in that role behind a greedy player like defoe

    Reply
  • Ronny
    2 years ago

    It was pretty stupid to sell Van der Vaart and replace him with Sigurdsson or Dempsey. Van der Vaart was one of the few world class talents Spurs had in their squad whereas Sigurdsson and Dempsey are just average. Even though i think Spurs have better squad compared to last season but quality of best 11 isn’t as good as it was last season. I actually don’t see Spurs finishing in top 4 this season unless they buy a world class player in January window.

    Reply
  • Bradley Villas Boas
    2 years ago

    I really think the case of Sigurdsson is a much simpler one.
    Teams play against spurs! the big teams think “we better turn up today or spurs could turn us over” and the smaller teams always fancy um selves in the hopes we are having a “typically tottenham” game and give points away.

    if you are stoke say, going away to swansea, you expect a point at least, no matter how you play, because its swansea.. yeah they play nice football but its swansea.

    so in conclusion he was never THAT good in the first place! he just played well with no pressure or high expectations from fans, manager or media.. or real pressure from his opponents.
    He can play, hes a big upgrade on jenas, ohara etc etc but hes no VDV by any stretch of the imagination. time will tell

    Reply
  • joe
    2 years ago

    Spurs are 4th despite having not fielded their best side once:
    Ade
    Bale, Sigurdsson, Lennon
    Dembele, Sandro
    BAE, Caulker, Vertonghen, Walker
    Lloris

    Bench – Defoe, Dempsey, Naughton, Gallas, Friedel

    Reply
  • Ross
    2 years ago

    We desperately need a world class number ten and may get one in January. Unfortunately this will work against both Dempsey and sig who at best will be impact players if this happens. We are poor around the opposition box with very little craft and creativity to supplement our pace on the break. A corzola type player would be a real asset or this Russian fella. If it happens it could spell the end for sig although as it stands I think we could be best to watch with sig and Ade up top.

    Reply
  • Alfie
    2 years ago

    Joe one glaring mistake with your line up. That being that Kaboul (instead of Caulker) when fit is by far and away our best defender. Add Parker to the mix and we’d trouble anyone

    Reply
  • Alan
    2 years ago

    If Vertg doesnt mind LB, then I keep him there and put Caulker and Kaboul in the middle. AVB may have other ideas though, ie Gallas keep his place no matter who else is fit. Hard to see evidence why Gallas is first choice in the middle but AVB seems to think so.

    With the form Sandros has been, Parker shld remain in the bench.

    Yes, agree Ade shld replace Defoe when fit.

    Personally prf Sig to Dempsey. Dunno abt u, Dempsey looked uninterested on the field… maybe he is still wandering why Liverpool didnt sign him. The only thing good abt Dempsey is… he can get into the right place at the right time to score.

    Reply
  • Acton_Yid
    2 years ago

    Vertonghen has stated on numerous occasions his best position is at CB, I don’t think AVB will want to rock the apple cart by insisting he plays at left back. Besides, I think BAE links up well with Bale. Back five for me (when all fit): Lloris, Walker, Kaboul, Vertonghen, BAE. Sandro would definitely get ahead of Parker on current form and fitness.

    Reply
  • Bradley Villas Boas
    2 years ago

    I think either Thud or Scotty P should be in ahead of Sandro when fit n on form and 4 4 2 is the way to go for me.. especially in home games against norwich an co. defo on his own is whats holding us back.
    Sigurdsson needs to play deeper, you need to be a special type of player and character to play in the whole.. he is not.

    Reply
Page:
12