West Ham are ready to challenge the FA’s disciplinary system, after they rejected their appeal over the controversial sending off of Andy Carroll, reports the Daily Mirror.

The Hammers are furious after their appeal over the red card – issued by World Cup referee Howard Webb – was dismissed on Tuesday.

They now want the FA to agree to an arbitration hearing under Rule K, which would see an independent body judge on the dispute.

If they do not get one, the Hammers are set to go to the High Court to seek an injunction to block Carroll’s dismissal and subsequent ban, pending a personal hearing.

That would free up the former Liverpool striker to play in the crucial relegation clashes with Aston Villa on Saturday, and Norwich next Tuesday.

However, the unprecedented action from the Hammers is set to have big ramifications.

All Premier League clubs have signed up to an FA agreement that the final decision of an independent panel in relation to wrongful dismissal is not subject to appeal.

The Hammers have enlisted tip QC Lord David Pannick to help with the case, and he has queried the FA’s claim that there has to be an ‘obvious error.’

Their statement on Tuesday said: “As stated in the Rules and Regulations of The FA, an Independent Regulatory Commission must apply the test of whether the decision to dismiss a player was ‘an obvious error.’”

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall

Login

Comment without logging in

You will need to fill this out each time to comment so why not quickly login with Facebook!

*

What do you think?

Sign in with Facebook and be
entered for a chance to
Win a pair of Puma evoPOWER football boots

Terms and Conditions

Why login with Facebook?

  • Sign up in 2 seconds
  • Use your FB profile image
  • No need to remember a password
  • See which of your friends would like this

Note: We don't post to your wall


  • Mik Hancock
    7 months ago

    I disagree. I have viewed the incident a view times. On the face it seemed a harsh decision, but I am sure I spotted just the teeniest of glints on Carroll’s face. Despite there being no contact, I am sure there was intent and thus the sending off was justified.

    Reply
  • User Avatar
    IanBrook
    7 months ago

    Definitely not a red card, if anything Carroll was fouled by Flores before his embarrassing effort to cheat and con the referee

    Reply